Department of Cardiology, Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Mar 15;105(6):773-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.11.006.
In patients suspected of having coronary artery disease (CAD), we compared the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of exercise testing using ST-segment changes alone and ST-segment changes, angina pectoris, and hemodynamic variables compared to coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA). Quantitative invasive coronary angiography was the reference method (>50% coronary lumen reduction). A positive exercise test was defined as the development of significant ST-segment changes (> or =1 mV measured 80 ms from the J-point), and the occurrence of one or more of the following criteria: ST-segment changes > or =1 mV measured 80 ms from the J-point, angina pectoris, ventricular arrhythmia (the occurrence of > or =3 premature ventricular beats), and > or =20 mm Hg decrease in systolic blood pressure during the test. Positive results on CTA were defined as a coronary lumen reduction of > or =50%. In 100 patients (61 +/- 9 years old, 50% men, and 29% prevalence of significant CAD), the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of exercise testing using ST-segment changes was 45% (95% confidence interval 53% to 87%) and 63% (95% confidence interval 61% to 84%), respectively. However, the inclusion of all test variables yielded a sensitivity of 72% (95% confidence interval 53% to 87%) and a specificity of 37% (95% confidence interval 26% to 49%). The diagnostic sensitivity of 97% (95% confidence interval 82% to 100%) and specificity of 80% (95% confidence interval 69% to 89%) for CTA, however, were superior to any of the exercise test analysis strategies. In conclusion, in patients suspected of having CAD, the diagnostic sensitivity of exercise testing significantly improves if all test variables are included compared to using ST-segment changes exclusively. Furthermore, the superior diagnostic performance of CTA for the detection and exclusion of significant CAD might favor CTA as the first-line diagnostic test in patients suspected of having CAD.
在疑似患有冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的患者中,我们比较了单独使用 ST 段改变、ST 段改变、心绞痛和血流动力学变量进行运动试验的诊断敏感性和特异性,与冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(CTA)相比。定量血管造影是参考方法(> 50%的冠状动脉管腔减少)。阳性运动试验定义为出现明显的 ST 段改变(从 J 点测量 80 毫秒时>或= 1 mV),并出现以下一个或多个标准:从 J 点测量 80 毫秒时 ST 段改变>或= 1 mV,心绞痛,室性心律失常(发生>或= 3 次室性早搏),和试验期间收缩压下降>或= 20 mmHg。CTA 的阳性结果定义为冠状动脉管腔减少>或= 50%。在 100 例患者(61 +/- 9 岁,50%为男性,29%有明显 CAD)中,使用 ST 段改变进行运动试验的诊断敏感性和特异性分别为 45%(95%置信区间 53%至 87%)和 63%(95%置信区间 61%至 84%)。然而,纳入所有试验变量的敏感性为 72%(95%置信区间 53%至 87%),特异性为 37%(95%置信区间 26%至 49%)。然而,CTA 的诊断敏感性为 97%(95%置信区间 82%至 100%),特异性为 80%(95%置信区间 69%至 89%),优于任何运动试验分析策略。总之,在疑似患有 CAD 的患者中,如果与单独使用 ST 段改变相比,纳入所有试验变量可显著提高运动试验的诊断敏感性。此外,CTA 对检测和排除显著 CAD 的诊断性能更好,可能有利于 CTA 作为疑似 CAD 患者的一线诊断测试。