Clinical Psychology, Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1116, USA.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2010 Aug;41(4):398-408. doi: 10.1007/s10578-010-0175-4.
Ostensible psychiatric comorbidity can sometimes be explained by shared relations between diagnostic constructs and higher order internalizing and externalizing dimensions. However, this possibility has not been explored with regard to comorbidity between personality pathology and other clinical constructs in adolescents. In this study, personality pattern scales from the Millon Adolescent Clinical Inventory in a sample of 492 adolescent inpatients were subjected to a principal components analysis to yield oblique internalizing and externalizing dimensions. Relations between personality dimensions and well-established measures of psychopathology (depression, alcohol abuse, drug abuse) and other indicators of clinical dysfunction (self-esteem, suicidality, violence) were assessed before and after controlling for these higher-order personality dimensions. Associations between personality scales and indicators of psychopathology and clinical dysfunction were minimal with these higher order components controlled. These results suggest that internalizing and externalizing personality dimensions explain most of the associations between personality patterns and indicators of psychopathology and clinical dysfunction in adolescent patients.
表面上的精神科共病有时可以用诊断结构与高阶内化和外化维度之间的共同关系来解释。然而,这种可能性尚未在青少年的人格病理学与其他临床结构的共病方面得到探讨。在这项研究中,对 492 名住院青少年的 Millon 青少年临床量表中的人格模式量表进行了主成分分析,得出了斜交的内化和外化维度。在控制这些高阶人格维度之后,评估了人格维度与既定的精神病理学(抑郁、酒精滥用、药物滥用)和其他临床功能障碍指标(自尊、自杀意念、暴力)之间的关系。在控制这些高阶成分后,人格量表与精神病理学和临床功能障碍指标之间的关联最小。这些结果表明,内化和外化的人格维度解释了人格模式与青少年患者的精神病理学和临床功能障碍指标之间的大多数关联。