Suppr超能文献

超声心动图测量右心室:右心室流出道 1.

Echocardiographic measurements of the right ventricle: right ventricular outflow tract 1.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Physiology, Orebro University Hospital, 701 85 Orebro, Sweden.

出版信息

Clin Res Cardiol. 2010 Jul;99(7):429-35. doi: 10.1007/s00392-010-0137-7. Epub 2010 Mar 7.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The size of the ventricles of the heart is important to establish during the clinical echocardiographic examination. Due to the complex anatomy of the right ventricle, it is difficult to measure its size at times. One of the most frequently used ways is to measure the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT1), probably due to its good reproducibility. However, in the literature different ways are described to measure RVOT1, both at different sites and using different methods such as M-mode and 2D. The first aim of the present study was to exam if there is a significant difference in the outcome of RVOT1 using different sites and methods to measure it. The second aim was to study if there is a significant difference between the usually preferred left lateral decubitus position during the echocardiographic examination and the supine decubitus position, which the echocardiographer sometimes can be compelled to use if the patient is unable to lie in the left lateral decubitus position.

METHODS

Twenty-seven healthy subjects were included and examined by echocardiography. RVOT1 was measured at different sites using different methods; first with the subject in the left lateral decubitus position and then repeating the same measurements with the subject in the supine decubitus position.

RESULTS

Comparing the RVOT1 measured at different sites and with different methods showed an overall significant difference (p < 0.001). Also when comparing the different body positions, there was an overall significant difference (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

When comparing RVOT1 of the same patient or subject over time, the results from the present study indicate that the same site, method and body position should be used.

摘要

目的

在临床超声心动图检查中,确定心脏心室的大小很重要。由于右心室的解剖结构复杂,有时很难测量其大小。最常用的方法之一是测量右心室流出道(RVOT1),可能是因为其可重复性好。然而,文献中描述了不同的方法来测量 RVOT1,包括在不同部位使用 M 模式和 2D 等不同方法。本研究的主要目的之一是检查使用不同部位和方法测量 RVOT1 时结果是否存在显著差异。第二个目的是研究在超声心动图检查中通常首选左侧卧位与超声医师有时不得不使用的仰卧位之间,RVOT1 是否存在显著差异,如果患者无法左侧卧位。

方法

纳入 27 名健康受试者并进行超声心动图检查。使用不同的方法在不同部位测量 RVOT1;首先让受试者处于左侧卧位,然后让受试者处于仰卧位重复相同的测量。

结果

比较不同部位和不同方法测量的 RVOT1 显示总体差异有统计学意义(p<0.001)。当比较不同的体位时,也存在总体差异(p=0.001)。

结论

当比较同一患者或受试者随时间变化的 RVOT1 时,本研究结果表明应使用相同的部位、方法和体位。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验