Council on Health Research for Development, Geneva, Switzerland.
Glob Public Health. 2010;5(2):154-63. doi: 10.1080/17441690903436599.
Over the past 25 years, the ethics of international health research have shifted from addressing narrow issues such as cultural differences in informed consent practices towards a greater emphasis on development and social justice. We anticipate that the next 'era' in international research ethics will involve an intensification of this focus on the role of research in achieving global justice. Three values, in particular, will shape how ethics considerations should evolve: solidarity; respect for Southern innovation; and commitment to action. We expect continuing debate on whether researchers and research sponsors should recognise more than a minimal set of obligations for the care and benefit of research participants and their communities. As the debate about the role of research in development intensifies, we expect to see new and more elaborate mechanisms for financing on-going access to beneficial interventions, ancillary care and other research-related benefits, as well as a greater involvement in research funding by developing country governments and private foundations. Ethics review and oversight need to reflect on these new values and on ways of operationalising them, or risk becoming marginalised in the research process.
在过去的 25 年中,国际卫生研究的伦理道德已经从解决知情同意实践中的文化差异等狭隘问题,转向更加注重发展和社会正义。我们预计,国际研究伦理的下一个“时代”将涉及更加关注研究在实现全球正义中的作用。有三个特别的价值观将影响道德考量的发展:团结;尊重南方创新;以及对行动的承诺。我们预计,关于研究人员和研究赞助商是否应该承认超出对研究参与者及其社区的关怀和利益的最低限度义务的持续辩论仍将继续。随着关于研究在发展中的作用的辩论加剧,我们预计将看到更多新的和更精细的机制来为持续获得有益的干预措施、辅助护理和其他与研究相关的利益提供资金,并看到发展中国家政府和私人基金会更多地参与研究资金。伦理审查和监督需要考虑到这些新的价值观以及将其付诸实施的方法,否则有可能在研究过程中被边缘化。