Suppr超能文献

基质辅助激光解吸/电离生物分型仪:在一家大学医院常规应用中的经验。

Matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization biotyper: experience in the routine of a University hospital.

机构信息

Laboratoire de Bactériologie, CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Apr;17(4):533-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03274.x.

Abstract

Matrix-assisted laser-desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) is positioned at the forefront of bacterial identification in the future. Its performance needed to be evaluated in a routine Bacteriology laboratory to determine its true benefits. A prospective study was carried out in the Bacteriology laboratory of the Pellegrin University Hospital in Bordeaux, France, from April to May 2009. Bacterial isolates from clinical samples were identified by conventional phenotypic bacteriological methods [Phoenix (Becton-Dickinson) or API strips (bioMérieux)] and in parallel with a mass spectrometer (Ultraflex III TOF/TOF and the biotyper database from Bruker Daltonics). In case of a discrepancy between these results at the genus level, a 16S rRNA and/or rpoB gene sequencing was performed. Of the 1013 bacteria tested, 837 (82.6%) were correctly identified at the species level by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MS) without extraction and 189 after extraction, i.e. 986 (97.3%) were correctly identified at the species level by MALDI-TOF MS, vs. 945 (93.2%) by phenotypic methods. Indeed, the extraction step was necessary for only 15% of the isolates. These results were even better when considering the genus, reaching almost 99% with MALDI-TOF MS and 98% with phenotypic methods. The performance of MALDI-TOF MS is very attractive considering its efficiency and rapidity, and the technique constitutes a precious tool for bacteriological identification in a routine laboratory.

摘要

基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间(MALDI-TOF)处于未来细菌鉴定的前沿。为了确定其真正的优势,需要在常规细菌学实验室中对其性能进行评估。2009 年 4 月至 5 月,在法国波尔多的佩雷格林大学医院的细菌学实验室进行了一项前瞻性研究。临床样本中的细菌分离物通过常规表型细菌学方法(Phoenix(贝克顿-迪金森)或 API 条带(生物梅里埃))和质谱仪(Ultraflex III TOF/TOF 和 Bruker Daltonics 的生物类型数据库)平行鉴定。如果在属水平上这些结果存在差异,则进行 16S rRNA 和/或 rpoB 基因测序。在测试的 1013 种细菌中,837 种(82.6%)未经提取即可通过 MALDI-TOF 质谱(MS)正确鉴定为种,189 种经提取后正确鉴定为种,即 986 种(97.3%)通过 MALDI-TOF MS 正确鉴定为种,而表型方法为 945 种(93.2%)。实际上,只有 15%的分离物需要提取步骤。考虑到属,结果甚至更好,MALDI-TOF MS 达到近 99%,表型方法达到 98%。考虑到 MALDI-TOF MS 的效率和快速性,其性能非常有吸引力,该技术构成了常规实验室中细菌鉴定的宝贵工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验