• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠状动脉综合征患者心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)风险评分与冠状动脉疾病程度的相关性

Correlation of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk score with extent of coronary artery disease in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

作者信息

Lakhani Muhammad Shakir, Qadir Faisal, Hanif Bashir, Farooq Salman, Khan Moinuddin

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Tabba Heart Institute, Ziauddin Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

J Pak Med Assoc. 2010 Mar;60(3):197-200.

PMID:20225777
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the correlation of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk score with extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

We conducted a descriptive study among 200 consecutive patients admitted with ACS at Tabba Heart Institute, Karachi from June to December 2008. The TIMI risk score was stratified on seven standard variables. The extent of CAD was evaluated on angiography and significant CAD was defined as > or =70% stenosis in any one of the three major epicardial vessels.

RESULTS

The mean age of the sample was 58.53 +/- 10.64 years. Out of 200 patients, there were 142 (71%) patients with TIMI score < or =4 (low and intermediate TIMI risk score) and 58 (29%) patients with TIMI score >4 (high TIMI risk score). Patients with TIMI score >4 were more likely to have significant three vessel CAD (62%) versus those with TIMI risk score <4 (46.2%), (p < 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Patients with high TIMI risk score were more likely to have severe multivessel CAD compared with those with low or intermediate TIMI risk score. Hence, patients with TIMI score >4 should be referred for early invasive coronary evaluation to derive clinical benefit.

摘要

目的

确定急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)风险评分与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)程度之间的相关性。

方法

2008年6月至12月期间,我们在卡拉奇塔巴心脏研究所对200例连续入院的ACS患者进行了一项描述性研究。TIMI风险评分根据七个标准变量进行分层。通过血管造影评估CAD的程度,显著CAD定义为三大心外膜血管中任何一支血管狭窄≥70%。

结果

样本的平均年龄为58.53±10.64岁。在200例患者中,有142例(71%)TIMI评分≤4(低和中度TIMI风险评分),58例(29%)TIMI评分>4(高TIMI风险评分)。TIMI评分>4的患者发生显著三支血管CAD的可能性更高(62%),而TIMI风险评分<4的患者为46.2%,(p<0.04)。

结论

与低或中度TIMI风险评分的患者相比,高TIMI风险评分的患者更有可能患有严重的多支血管CAD。因此,TIMI评分>4的患者应尽早接受侵入性冠状动脉评估以获得临床益处。

相似文献

1
Correlation of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk score with extent of coronary artery disease in patients with acute coronary syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征患者心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)风险评分与冠状动脉疾病程度的相关性
J Pak Med Assoc. 2010 Mar;60(3):197-200.
2
Comparison of the TIMI and the GRACE risk scores with the extent of coronary artery disease in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者中TIMI和GRACE风险评分与冠状动脉疾病程度的比较。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2013 Jun;63(6):691-5.
3
Correlation of TIMI risk score with angiographic severity and extent of coronary artery disease in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者TIMI风险评分与冠状动脉造影严重程度及病变范围的相关性
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Apr 1;93(7):813-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.12.015.
4
[Correlation of TIMI risk score with angiographic extent and severity of coronary artery disease in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes].[非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征中TIMI风险评分与冠状动脉疾病血管造影范围及严重程度的相关性]
Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2011 Apr;60(2):87-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2010.12.014. Epub 2011 Jan 12.
5
The relationship of TIMI risk index with SYNTAX and Gensini risk scores in predicting the extent and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中,TIMI风险指数与SYNTAX和Gensini风险评分在预测冠状动脉疾病范围及严重程度方面的关系。
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Oct;9(5):257-66. doi: 10.1177/1753944715574814. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
6
Relation between thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score and one-year outcomes for patients presenting at the emergency department with potential acute coronary syndrome.急性心肌梗死溶栓治疗风险评分与以潜在急性冠脉综合征就诊于急诊科患者的一年预后的关系。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Feb 15;105(4):441-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.10.015. Epub 2010 Jan 5.
7
[Clinical study on value of severity of patient with coronary artery disease evaluated with the thrombosis in myocardial infarction risk score].[心肌梗死风险评分评估冠状动脉疾病患者严重程度价值的临床研究]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2004 Apr;16(4):239-41.
8
Comparison of the GRACE risk score and the TIMI risk index in predicting the extent and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with acute coronary syndrome.比较GRACE风险评分与TIMI风险指数在预测急性冠脉综合征患者冠状动脉疾病范围及严重程度方面的作用。
Anatol J Cardiol. 2015 Oct;15(10):801-6. doi: 10.5152/akd.2014.5802. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
9
Modified thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk score to risk stratify patients in the emergency department with possible acute coronary syndrome.改良心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)风险评分用于对急诊科疑似急性冠脉综合征患者进行风险分层。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2007 Oct;24(2):137-44. doi: 10.1007/s11239-007-0013-0. Epub 2007 Feb 21.
10
Correlation of cardiac troponin I levels (10 folds upper limit of normal) and extent of coronary artery disease in non-ST elevation myocardial infarction.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中心肌肌钙蛋白I水平(正常上限的10倍)与冠状动脉疾病范围的相关性
J Pak Med Assoc. 2010 Jun;60(6):423-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical decision-making in patients with non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: more than risk stratification.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的临床决策:不仅仅是风险分层。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Oct 23;11:1382374. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1382374. eCollection 2024.
2
HEART and TIMI Scores Predict Severe Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease.HEART评分和TIMI评分可预测终末期肾病患者的严重冠状动脉粥样硬化。
Cureus. 2023 Jun 14;15(6):e40408. doi: 10.7759/cureus.40408. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
Clinical Validation of the Shock Index, Modified Shock Index, Delta Shock Index, and Shock Index-C for Emergency Department ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
急诊科ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的休克指数、改良休克指数、休克指数差值及休克指数-C的临床验证
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 1;11(19):5839. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195839.
4
Frequency of Multivessel Severe Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Having Markedly Raised Cardiac Troponin T.心肌肌钙蛋白T显著升高的非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者多支严重冠状动脉疾病的发生率
Cureus. 2020 Aug 5;12(8):e9571. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9571.
5
Circulating microRNA expression profiling and bioinformatics analysis of patients with coronary artery disease by RNA sequencing.通过 RNA 测序对冠心病患者的循环 microRNA 表达谱进行分析和生物信息学分析。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2020 Jan;34(1):e23020. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23020. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
6
Characteristics of T cell receptor repertoires of patients with acute myocardial infarction through high-throughput sequencing.通过高通量测序分析急性心肌梗死患者 T 细胞受体谱的特征。
J Transl Med. 2019 Jan 11;17(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12967-019-1768-8.
7
GRACE and TIMI risk scores in predicting the angiographic severity of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome.GRACE和TIMI风险评分在预测非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征血管造影严重程度中的应用
Indian Heart J. 2018 Dec;70 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S250-S253. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2018.01.026. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
8
Risk stratification and prognostic value of grace and timi risk scores for female patients with non-st segment elevation acute coronary syndrome.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征女性患者的GRACE和TIMI风险评分的风险分层及预后价值
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Mar 15;8(3):4038-44. eCollection 2015.
9
Predictive value of the novel risk score BETTER (BiomarkErs and compuTed Tomography scorE on Risk stratification) for patients with unstable angina.新型风险评分BETTER(生物标志物与计算机断层扫描评分用于风险分层)对不稳定型心绞痛患者的预测价值。
Herz. 2015 Mar;40 Suppl 1:43-50. doi: 10.1007/s00059-014-4141-y. Epub 2014 Aug 31.
10
Comparison of TIMI and Gensini score in patients admitted to the emergency department with chest pain, who underwent coronary angiography.对因胸痛入住急诊科且接受了冠状动脉造影的患者的TIMI评分和Gensini评分进行比较。
Med Sci Monit. 2014 Mar 1;20:343-9. doi: 10.12659/MSM.889600.