Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of International Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Public Health. 2010 Mar;124(3):159-66. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2009.12.006. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
Future Health Systems: Innovations for Equity (FHS) is working in six partner countries in Asia and Africa, focusing on strengthening the research-policy interface in relation to specific health system research projects. These projects present an opportunity to study the influence of stakeholders on research and policy processes.
Qualitative stakeholder analysis.
Stakeholder analysis was conducted in each FHS country using a structured approach. A cross-country evaluation was performed concentrating on six key areas: chosen research topic; type of intervention considered; inclusion/exclusion of stakeholder groups; general stakeholder considerations; power level, power type and agreement level of stakeholders; and classification of and approaches to identified stakeholders.
All six countries identified a range of stakeholders but each country had a different focus. Four of the six countries identified stakeholders in addition to the guidelines, while some of the stakeholder categories were not identified by countries. The mean power level of identified stakeholders was between 3.4 and 4.5 (1=very low; 5=very high). The percentage of classified stakeholders that were either drivers or supporters ranged from 60% to 91%.
Three important common areas emerge when examining the execution of the FHS country stakeholder analyses: clarity on the purpose of the analyses; value of internal vs external analysts; and the role of primary vs secondary analyses. This paper adds to the global body of knowledge on the utilization of stakeholder analysis to strengthen the research-policy interface in the developing world.
未来卫生系统:公平创新(FHS)正在亚洲和非洲的六个合作伙伴国家开展工作,重点是加强与特定卫生系统研究项目相关的研究政策接口。这些项目为研究利益相关者对研究和政策过程的影响提供了机会。
定性利益相关者分析。
在每个 FHS 国家使用结构化方法进行利益相关者分析。进行了跨国评估,重点关注六个关键领域:选择的研究主题;考虑的干预类型;利益相关者群体的纳入/排除;一般利益相关者考虑因素;利益相关者的权力水平、权力类型和一致性;以及确定的利益相关者的分类和方法。
所有六个国家都确定了一系列利益相关者,但每个国家的重点不同。六个国家中有四个国家除了指南外还确定了利益相关者,而一些利益相关者类别未被国家确定。确定的利益相关者的平均权力水平在 3.4 到 4.5 之间(1=非常低;5=非常高)。被归类为驱动者或支持者的利益相关者的百分比从 60%到 91%不等。
在审查 FHS 国家利益相关者分析的执行情况时,出现了三个重要的共同领域:分析目的的明确性;内部与外部分析员的价值;以及主要与次要分析的作用。本文增加了全球关于利用利益相关者分析来加强发展中国家研究政策接口的知识体系。