• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利益相关者参与倡导者:一种在全球卫生研究中建立有影响力和可持续关系的地方驱动模式。

Stakeholder engagement champions: a locally-driven model for building impactful and sustainable relationships in global health research.

作者信息

Jackson Tracy, Fernandes Genevie, Williams Siân, Nathan Jayakayatri Jeevajothi, Makita Meiko

机构信息

Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.

International Primary Care Respiratory Group, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.

出版信息

J Glob Health. 2025 Jun 6;15:03026. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.03026.

DOI:10.7189/jogh.15.03026
PMID:40476582
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12143356/
Abstract

Stakeholder engagement is increasingly required by global health funders as a means to enhance research impact and bridge the gap between knowledge generation and its application in local health systems. However, global health researchers often face structural and operational barriers that limit meaningful stakeholder engagement. We present a practical model developed by a global respiratory health research programme implemented in four low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) - Bangladesh, India, Malaysia, and Pakistan. The model centred on designating in-country stakeholder engagement champions - locally based professionals with strong communication skills and contextual understanding of the health system and stakeholders. These champions were supported through mentorship, peer exchange, and capacity-building activities delivered by a central community and stakeholder engagement platform comprising experts and researchers. The champions had autonomy to design context-specific engagement strategies, allocate resources, and lead interactions with stakeholders throughout the research lifecycle. This decentralised approach enabled tailored engagement, fostered south-south learning, and created leadership opportunities for LMIC researchers. Despite successes, challenges included managing power imbalances, limited institutional capacity, and increased workloads. The model offers a promising approach for advancing equitable partnerships and local leadership in global health research, aligning with broader efforts to decolonise global health and promote meaningful, context-driven stakeholder engagement.

摘要

全球卫生资助者越来越要求开展利益相关方参与活动,以此作为增强研究影响力、弥合知识生成与在地方卫生系统中应用之间差距的一种手段。然而,全球卫生研究人员常常面临限制有意义的利益相关方参与的结构和操作障碍。我们介绍了一个由在四个低收入和中等收入国家(孟加拉国、印度、马来西亚和巴基斯坦)实施的全球呼吸健康研究项目所开发的实用模式。该模式的核心是指定国内利益相关方参与活动的倡导者——具备较强沟通技巧且对卫生系统和利益相关方有情境理解的当地专业人员。这些倡导者通过由一个由专家和研究人员组成的中央社区及利益相关方参与平台提供的指导、同行交流和能力建设活动获得支持。倡导者有权自主设计针对具体情境的参与策略、分配资源,并在整个研究周期内主导与利益相关方的互动。这种分散式方法实现了量身定制的参与,促进了南南学习,并为低收入和中等收入国家的研究人员创造了领导机会。尽管取得了成功,但挑战包括管理权力不平衡、机构能力有限以及工作量增加。该模式为推进全球卫生研究中的公平伙伴关系和地方领导力提供了一种有前景的方法,与使全球卫生非殖民化及促进有意义的、情境驱动的利益相关方参与的更广泛努力相一致。

相似文献

1
Stakeholder engagement champions: a locally-driven model for building impactful and sustainable relationships in global health research.利益相关者参与倡导者:一种在全球卫生研究中建立有影响力和可持续关系的地方驱动模式。
J Glob Health. 2025 Jun 6;15:03026. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.03026.
2
Building and Sustaining Effective Partnerships for Training the Next Generation of Global Health Leaders.建立和维持有效的伙伴关系,以培养下一代全球卫生领导者。
Ann Glob Health. 2021 Jul 12;87(1):66. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3214. eCollection 2021.
3
Developing and planning country-specific integrated knowledge translation strategies: experiences from the GELA project in Malawi, Nigeria, and South Africa.制定和规划具有国家特色的综合知识转化策略:来自马拉维、尼日利亚和南非 GELA 项目的经验。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 27;24(1):1418. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18934-8.
4
Nurturing transformative local structures of multisectoral collaboration for primary health care: qualitative insights from select states in India.培育基层医疗多方协作的变革性地方结构:来自印度部分邦的定性见解。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 16;24(1):634. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11002-2.
5
Barriers and drivers to stakeholder engagement in global mental health projects.全球精神卫生项目中利益相关者参与的障碍与驱动因素
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2021 Apr 3;15(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13033-021-00458-y.
6
A context-driven approach through stakeholder engagement to introduce a digital emergency obstetric and newborn care register into routine obstetric health care services in Bangladesh.通过利益相关者的参与,采用一种基于情境的方法,在孟加拉国将数字化的产科和新生儿急救登记系统引入常规产科保健服务中。
J Glob Health. 2024 May 10;14:04098. doi: 10.7189/jogh.14.04098.
7
Engaging stakeholders to level up COPD care in LMICs: lessons learned from the "Breathe Well" programme in Brazil, China, Georgia, and North Macedonia.让利益相关者参与,提升中低收入国家 COPD 护理水平:“呼吸好”项目在巴西、中国、格鲁吉亚和北马其顿的经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jan 12;24(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10525-4.
8
Introducing pulse oximetry in routine IMCI services in Bangladesh: A context-driven approach to influence policy and programme through stakeholder engagement.在孟加拉国的常规综合管理儿童疾病服务中引入脉搏血氧饱和度测定法:一种通过利益相关者参与来影响政策和项目的情境驱动方法。
J Glob Health. 2022 Apr 9;12:06001. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.06001. eCollection 2022.
9
Engaging stakeholders in Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) Implementation Research in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): a scoping review protocol.让利益相关者参与低收入和中等收入国家非传染性疾病实施研究:一项范围审查方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 9;14(12):e089689. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089689.
10
An emerging knowledge exchange framework: Leadership insight into a key capacity-building impact in a large urban, trauma-informed initiative supporting resiliency and promoting equity.一个新兴的知识交流框架:领导力洞察对一项大型城市创伤知情倡议中关键能力建设影响的作用,该倡议支持恢复力并促进公平。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 13;25(1):1746. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22268-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Sustaining stakeholder engagement for health research during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons from the RESPIRE programme in Bangladesh, India, Malaysia, and Pakistan.在新冠疫情期间维持利益相关者对健康研究的参与:来自孟加拉国、印度、马来西亚和巴基斯坦的RESPIRE项目的经验教训。
J Glob Health. 2022 Sep 3;12:03057. doi: 10.7189/jogh.12.03057.
2
Why and for whom are we decolonising global health?我们为何要使全球卫生摆脱殖民色彩,又是为谁这样做?
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Oct;9(10):e1359-e1360. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00317-X.
3
Decolonising global health in 2021: a roadmap to move from rhetoric to reform.
2021年全球卫生去殖民化:从言辞到改革的路线图。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Mar;6(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005604.
4
Engaging with stakeholders in a research programme to promote implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation in Bangladesh: Challenges and opportunities.在一项研究项目中与利益相关者合作以促进孟加拉国肺康复的实施:挑战与机遇
J Glob Health. 2020 Dec;10(2):020384. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.020384.
5
Decolonising global health: transnational research partnerships under the spotlight.去殖民化全球健康:跨国研究伙伴关系成为焦点。
Int Health. 2020 Nov 9;12(6):518-523. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa073.
6
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic response on other health research.新冠疫情应对措施对其他健康研究的影响。
Bull World Health Organ. 2020 Sep 1;98(9):625-631. doi: 10.2471/BLT.20.257485. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
7
Patient and public involvement in research: from tokenistic box ticking to valued team members.患者和公众参与研究:从象征性的勾选到有价值的团队成员。
BMC Med. 2020 Apr 13;18(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01544-7.
8
RESPIRE: The National Institute for Health Research's (NIHR) Global Respiratory Health Unit.呼吸:英国国家卫生研究院(NIHR)全球呼吸健康部门。
J Glob Health. 2018 Dec;8(2):020101. doi: 10.7189/jogh.08.020101.
9
How to engage stakeholders in research: design principles to support improvement.如何让利益相关者参与研究:支持改进的设计原则。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 11;16(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0337-6.
10
From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement.从象征主义到赋权:推动患者及公众参与医疗保健改善
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Aug;25(8):626-32. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004839. Epub 2016 Mar 18.