Kirby Allison L, Rosenkrantz Wayne S, Ghubash Rudayna M, Neradilek Blazej, Polissar Nayak L
Animal Dermatology Clinic, Marina Del Rey, CA 90292, USA.
Vet Dermatol. 2010 Apr;21(2):175-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3164.2009.00783.x.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the level of bacterial contamination of otoscope cones in veterinary private practice, and to determine the most effective method of disinfection. Fifty small animal practices participated in this study, which included a detailed survey regarding otoscope cleaning, storage and usage and quantitative culture of the cleaned and stored otoscope cones. Using sterile technique, two cones from each of the 50 hospitals were swabbed and submitted for quantitative culture. Contamination was present in 29% of the samples and the following organisms were isolated: Flavobacterium brevis (10%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6%), Pseudomonas alcaligenes (4%), Staphylococcus intermedius (4%), Corynebacterium spp. (2%), Bacillus spp. (1%), Enterococcus faecalis (1%) Malassezia spp. (1%). There was no statistically significant difference between storage type (dry versus stored in solution) and for the instrumentation used to clean the cones (brush, cotton-tipped applicator, both versus none). There was a statistically significant difference between the different cleaning solutions (P < 0.001) and between the storage solutions (P = 0.003). A single most effective cleaning solution was unable to be determined due to the large number of solutions utilized. Cetylcide G (Cetylite Industries, Inc., Pennsauken, NJ, USA) was the most effective of the three most commonly used storage solutions (Cetylcide G, Benz-all, and 2% Chlorhexidine gluconate) when used as directed (P < 0.001). The level of contamination had a positive association with the frequency of cone use and a negative association with the frequency of storage solution replacement.
本研究的目的是评估兽医私人诊所中耳镜窥镜的细菌污染水平,并确定最有效的消毒方法。五十家小动物诊所参与了本研究,其中包括一项关于耳镜清洁、储存和使用的详细调查,以及对清洁和储存后的耳镜窥镜进行定量培养。采用无菌技术,对50家医院每家的两个窥镜进行擦拭,并送去进行定量培养。29%的样本存在污染,分离出以下微生物:短黄杆菌(10%)、铜绿假单胞菌(6%)、产碱假单胞菌(4%)、中间葡萄球菌(4%)、棒状杆菌属(2%)、芽孢杆菌属(1%)、粪肠球菌(1%)、马拉色菌属(1%)。储存类型(干燥与储存在溶液中)以及用于清洁窥镜的器械(刷子、棉签、两者都用与都不用)之间没有统计学上的显著差异。不同的清洁溶液之间(P < 0.001)以及储存溶液之间(P = 0.003)存在统计学上的显著差异。由于使用的溶液种类繁多,无法确定单一最有效的清洁溶液。按照说明使用时,在三种最常用的储存溶液(十六烷基季铵盐G(Cetylite Industries, Inc., Pennsauken, NJ, USA)、苯扎氯铵和2%葡萄糖酸氯己定)中,十六烷基季铵盐G是最有效的(P < 0.001)。污染水平与窥镜的使用频率呈正相关,与储存溶液更换频率呈负相关。