Physiology and Experimental Medicine Program, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Intensive Care Med. 2010 May;36(5):750-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1850-4. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
Significant advances in the management of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome have been few in the recent past despite considerable efforts in clinical testing and experimental work. The biotrauma hypothesis of ventilator-associated lung injury (VALI), suggesting that mechanical ventilation induces the release of injurious mediators from the lung, implies that pharmaceutical interventions targeting these circulating pathogenic mediators would be clinically beneficial. Among the commonly reported classes of ventilation-associated mediators are cytokines, coagulation factors, hormones (e.g., angiotensin-II), lipid-derived mediators and oxidants, yet proof of their pathogenicity is lacking.
This review discusses evidence surrounding the roles of these mediators in VALI and describes how definitive proof could be provided based on Koch's postulates, using an isolated perfused lung model. According to this experimental concept, candidate mediators would fulfill certain criteria, including increased accumulation in perfusate during injurious ventilation and induction of injury during non-injurious ventilation. Accumulation of mediators in the perfusate would facilitate isolation and characterization by standard biochemical means, from broad determination of physical and chemical properties to precise identification of individual molecules (e.g., by modern "omic" approaches such as mass spectrometry). Finally, confirmation by exogenous administration of mediators or antagonists can assess effects on injury and its mechanisms such as cell permeability or cytotoxicity.
Adaptation of Koch's postulates to the biotrauma hypothesis of VALI could provide important insights. Translation of the acquired knowledge into clinical testing is challenged by the heterogeneity of the patient population (e.g., etiology, co-morbidity, genetics or concomitant therapy) and the specificity and efficacy of the therapeutic intervention on the cellular/molecular level.
尽管在临床测试和实验工作方面付出了相当大的努力,但在过去的几年中,急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的治疗进展甚微。呼吸机相关性肺损伤(VALI)的生物创伤假说表明,机械通气会导致肺释放有害介质,这意味着针对这些循环致病介质的药物干预将具有临床益处。在常见报道的通气相关介质类别中,有细胞因子、凝血因子、激素(如血管紧张素-II)、脂质衍生介质和氧化剂,但缺乏其致病性的证据。
本文综述了这些介质在 VALI 中的作用的证据,并描述了如何根据 Koch 的假设,使用离体灌注肺模型,提供明确的证据。根据这一实验概念,候选介质将满足某些标准,包括在损伤性通气期间在灌流液中积累增加,以及在非损伤性通气期间诱导损伤。通过标准生化手段,包括从广泛的物理和化学性质的测定到对单个分子的精确鉴定(例如,通过现代“组学”方法,如质谱),在灌流液中积累的介质将有助于分离和特征鉴定。最后,通过外源性给予介质或拮抗剂来确认,可评估其对损伤及其机制的影响,如细胞通透性或细胞毒性。
将 Koch 的假设适应 VALI 的生物创伤假说可以提供重要的见解。将获得的知识转化为临床测试受到患者人群的异质性(例如,病因、合并症、遗传或伴随治疗)以及治疗干预在细胞/分子水平上的特异性和疗效的挑战。