McCaul M E, Turkkan J S, Svikis D S, Bigelow G E
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1991 Feb;15(1):94-101. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1991.tb00524.x.
Response differences following administration of alcohol between adult males with a positive (FHP) versus negative (FHN) family history of alcoholism have been demonstrated in previous research and are thought to be related to risk for developing alcoholism. If this is so, the pharmacological breadth of addiction risk conferred by a positive family alcoholism history might be studied by determining whether FHP subjects show different responses than FHN to drug classes other than alcohol. We have previously reported on the acute effects of ethanol as compared with secobarbital in FHP and FHN subjects and found that FHP subjects showed greater sensitivity across a variety of subjective measures than FHN subjects for both drug classes. The data reported here are based on an extended data collection period of 3 to 18 hr postingestion, following completion of the acute laboratory portion of the study. Specifically, in the present study, dose-effect timecourse functions for a variety of physiological (heart rate, blood pressure, and breath alcohol level), subjective (analog mood, drug effect, and withdrawal, Subjective High Assessment Scale (SHAS], and psychomotor measures (Digit Symbol Substitution Test and numeric recall) were examined in FHP and FHN college-aged males for secobarbital (0, 100, 200 mg daily) and ethanol (1 g/kg daily). FHP and FHN subjects were matched on light-to-moderate drinking patterns, anthropometric dimensions, age, years of schooling, and drug use. FHP subjects reported more extended intoxication and greater withdrawal effects following both ethanol and the high dose of secobarbital than did FHN subjects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
先前的研究已表明,有酒精中毒家族阳性史(FHP)的成年男性与有酒精中毒家族阴性史(FHN)的成年男性在摄入酒精后的反应存在差异,且认为这与患酒精中毒的风险有关。如果真是这样,那么通过确定FHP受试者与FHN受试者对酒精以外的其他药物类别是否有不同反应,或许可以研究阳性家族酒精中毒史所赋予的成瘾风险的药理学广度。我们之前曾报道过FHP和FHN受试者中乙醇与司可巴比妥的急性效应,发现对于这两类药物,FHP受试者在各种主观测量指标上比FHN受试者表现出更高的敏感性。此处报告的数据基于研究急性实验室部分完成后3至18小时的延长数据收集期。具体而言,在本研究中,对FHP和FHN的大学年龄男性受试者,检测了司可巴比妥(每日0、100、200毫克)和乙醇(每日1克/千克)的多种生理指标(心率、血压和呼气酒精水平)、主观指标(类似情绪、药物效应和戒断反应、主观高评价量表[SHAS])以及心理运动指标(数字符号替换测试和数字回忆)的剂量 - 效应时程函数。FHP和FHN受试者在轻度至中度饮酒模式、人体测量维度、年龄、受教育年限和药物使用方面相匹配。与FHN受试者相比,FHP受试者在摄入乙醇和高剂量司可巴比妥后报告的中毒持续时间更长,戒断效应更明显。(摘要截选至250字)