Suppr超能文献

颈动脉分叉的评估:磁共振血管造影与数字减影主动脉弓造影的比较。

Evaluation of the carotid artery bifurcation: comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction arch aortography.

作者信息

Kido D K, Barsotti J B, Rice L Z, Rothenberg B M, Panzer R J, Souza S P, Dumoulin C L

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York.

出版信息

Neuroradiology. 1991;33(1):48-51. doi: 10.1007/BF00593333.

Abstract

Thirty-four carotid artery bifurcations were examined using both magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and digital subtraction arch aortography to determine their accuracy when compared to selective carotid angiography. The sensitivity of MRA was 73% and its specificity was 91% when compared with selective carotid angiography. The sensitivity of arch aortography was 27% and its specificity was 100%.

摘要

使用磁共振血管造影(MRA)和数字减影主动脉弓造影对34个颈动脉分叉进行检查,以确定与选择性颈动脉造影相比时它们的准确性。与选择性颈动脉造影相比,MRA的敏感性为73%,特异性为91%。主动脉弓造影的敏感性为27%,特异性为100%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验