Suppr超能文献

颈动脉分叉的评估:磁共振血管造影与数字减影主动脉弓造影的比较。

Evaluation of the carotid artery bifurcation: comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction arch aortography.

作者信息

Kido D K, Barsotti J B, Rice L Z, Rothenberg B M, Panzer R J, Souza S P, Dumoulin C L

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, New York.

出版信息

Neuroradiology. 1991;33(1):48-51. doi: 10.1007/BF00593333.

Abstract

Thirty-four carotid artery bifurcations were examined using both magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and digital subtraction arch aortography to determine their accuracy when compared to selective carotid angiography. The sensitivity of MRA was 73% and its specificity was 91% when compared with selective carotid angiography. The sensitivity of arch aortography was 27% and its specificity was 100%.

摘要

使用磁共振血管造影(MRA)和数字减影主动脉弓造影对34个颈动脉分叉进行检查,以确定与选择性颈动脉造影相比时它们的准确性。与选择性颈动脉造影相比,MRA的敏感性为73%,特异性为91%。主动脉弓造影的敏感性为27%,特异性为100%。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验