Langlois Y, Roederer G O, Chan A, Phillips D J, Beach K W, Martin D, Chikos P M, Strandness D E
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1983 Jan-Feb;9(1):51-63. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(83)90109-6.
The results of ultrasonic pulsed Doppler duplex scanning with spectral analysis and computer pattern recognition are compared with the results of contrast arteriography in patients screened for extracranial carotid artery disease. The intraangiographer variability (one radiologist reading the same films twice) and the interangiographer variability (two radiologists reading the same film independently) were also studied. To calculate degrees of agreement corrected for chance, the Kappa statistic was computed for all the evaluation methods employed. At the present time, the concordance between spectral analysis and cerebral contrast angiography reaches a Kappa value of 0.682 +/- 0.064. This level of agreement compares favorably with the interangiographer agreement level (K = 0.568 +/- 0.058) and the intraangiographer agreement (K = 0.711 +/- 0.054). The computer pattern recognition program predicted the degree of stenosis by angiography with an agreement of K = 0.721 +/- 0.059. This concordance compares favorably to that observed when the radiologists are compared with themselves and is greater than that reached by two different radiologists. The continuous improvement in precision and accuracy of duplex scanning offers the promise of its usefulness in clinical and epidemiological studies.
将采用频谱分析和计算机模式识别的超声脉冲多普勒双功扫描结果,与筛选颅外颈动脉疾病患者的对比动脉造影结果进行比较。还研究了血管造影技师内部的变异性(一位放射科医生对同一组片子读两次)和血管造影技师之间的变异性(两位放射科医生独立阅读同一组片子)。为计算校正了机遇因素后的一致性程度,对所采用的所有评估方法计算卡帕统计量。目前,频谱分析与脑对比血管造影之间的一致性达到卡帕值0.682±0.064。该一致性水平与血管造影技师之间的一致性水平(K = 0.568±0.058)和血管造影技师内部的一致性(K = 0.711±0.054)相比更具优势。计算机模式识别程序通过血管造影预测狭窄程度,一致性为K = 0.721±0.059。该一致性与放射科医生自身比较时观察到的一致性相比更具优势,且大于两位不同放射科医生之间的一致性。双功扫描精度和准确性的不断提高,有望使其在临床和流行病学研究中发挥作用。