Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30341-3724, USA.
Public Health Rep. 2010 Mar-Apr;125(2):208-17. doi: 10.1177/003335491012500209.
U.S. women experience high rates of unplanned pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), yet they seldom combine condoms with highly effective contraceptives for optimal protection. Because oral contracep tives (OCs) have been the predominant form of highly effective contraceptio in the U.S., it is unknown whether condom use is similarly low with increasingly promoted user-independent methods.
We used weighted data from the National Survey of Family Growth to assess condom use odds among women relying on OCs vs. user-independent methods (i.e., injectibles, intrauterine devices, and implants). We also estimated the expected reduction in unplanned pregnancies and abortions if half or all of the women currently using a single highly effective method also used condoms.
Across every demographic subgroup based on age, partner status, race/ethnicity, household income, and education, condom use prevalence was lower for women relying on user-independent methods vs. OCs. Multivariable models for adult women also revealed a significant reduction within most demographic subgroups in the odds of condom use among women relying on user-independent methods vs. OCs. Population estimates suggested that if half of all women using highly effective methods alone also used condoms, approximately 40% of unplanned pregnancies and abortions among these women could be prevented, for an annual reduction of 393,000 unplanned pregnancies and nearly 76,000 abortions. If all highly effective method users also used condoms, approximately 80% of unplanned pregnancies and abortions among these women could be prevented, for an annual reduction of 786,000 unplanned pregnancies and nearly 152,000 abortions.
Adding condoms to other methods should be considered seriously as the first line of defense against unplanned pregnancy and STls. This analysis can serve to target interventions where dual-method promotion is needed most.
美国女性意外怀孕和性传播感染(STIs)的发生率很高,但她们很少将避孕套与高效避孕措施结合使用,以获得最佳保护。由于口服避孕药(OCs)一直是美国高效避孕的主要形式,因此尚不清楚随着越来越多的非使用者依赖方法的推广,避孕套的使用是否同样较低。
我们使用全国家庭增长调查的加权数据来评估依赖 OCs 与非使用者依赖方法(即注射剂、宫内节育器和植入物)的女性使用避孕套的几率。我们还估计,如果当前使用单一高效方法的一半或全部女性也使用避孕套,那么意外怀孕和堕胎的预期减少量。
根据年龄、伴侣状况、种族/族裔、家庭收入和教育等所有人口统计学亚组,依赖非使用者依赖方法的女性使用避孕套的流行率低于依赖 OCs 的女性。成人女性的多变量模型还显示,在大多数人口统计学亚组中,依赖非使用者依赖方法的女性与 OCs 相比,使用避孕套的几率显著降低。人口估计表明,如果所有单独使用高效方法的女性中有一半也使用避孕套,那么这些女性中大约 40%的意外怀孕和堕胎可以预防,每年可减少 393,000 例意外怀孕和近 76,000 例堕胎。如果所有高效方法使用者都使用避孕套,那么这些女性中大约 80%的意外怀孕和堕胎可以预防,每年可减少 786,000 例意外怀孕和近 152,000 例堕胎。
应该认真考虑将避孕套添加到其他方法中,作为预防意外怀孕和 STIs 的第一道防线。此分析可以针对最需要双重方法推广的干预措施进行目标定位。