Mamassian Pascal, de Montalembert Marie
Laboratoire Psychologie de la Perception (CNRS UMR 8158), Université Paris Descartes, France.
Vision Res. 2010 May 12;50(10):956-62. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.03.005. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
In spite of being one of the most elementary visual effects, the vertical-horizontal illusion is still poorly understood. We provide here a simple quantitative model to describe the overestimation of the vertical segment relative to the horizontal one. The model also includes a necessary factor related to the effect of bisecting a line on the under-estimation of its length. These two factors, orientation anisotropy and length bisection, provide a very good account of various configurations of the illusion when the stimulus looks like a 'T', an 'L', or a '+'-sign, and for different stimulus orientations. The orientation anisotropy bias is on average 6% while the length bisection bias amounts to about 16%. In addition, when uncertainty about line estimation is included, new predictions on the sensitivity of different configurations are obtained and confirmed. In particular, we find that the '+'-sign figure suffers from a loss of sensitivity in comparing their vertical and horizontal segments when compared to the 'L'-figure. This difference can only be accounted for by a late-noise model where uncertainty is at the decision stage rather than on the image measurements.
尽管垂直-水平错觉是最基本的视觉效果之一,但人们对它的理解仍然很有限。我们在此提供一个简单的定量模型,以描述相对于水平线段,垂直线段被高估的现象。该模型还包括一个与线段二等分对其长度低估效应相关的必要因素。当刺激呈现为“T”形、“L”形或“+”形,以及不同的刺激方向时,这两个因素,即方向各向异性和长度二等分,能很好地解释错觉的各种配置情况。方向各向异性偏差平均为6%,而长度二等分偏差约为16%。此外,当考虑到线段估计的不确定性时,会得到并证实关于不同配置敏感性的新预测。特别是,我们发现与“L”形图形相比,“+”形图形在比较其垂直和水平线段时灵敏度会降低。这种差异只能由后期噪声模型来解释,即不确定性存在于决策阶段而非图像测量阶段。