Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology do Hospital das Clíìnicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Laboratory of Kinesiology, São Paulo, Brazil.
Int J Sports Med. 2010 Jun;31(6):433-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1249087. Epub 2010 Mar 18.
Our purpose was to examine possible influences of age on resistance exercise (RE) intensity progression in men. Twenty-four men, divided in young sedentary (YS; n=10; 25.9+/-3.7 years), older sedentary (OS; n=7; 67.4+/-5.2 years), and older runners (OR; n=7; 71.3+/-3.0 years), underwent a 2 times-a-week RE program for 13 weeks. Muscle strength was assessed before and after training by 1-repetition maximum test. RE workloads were recorded for each exercise session, and increases of 5-10% were made whenever adaptation occurred. Muscle strength improved similarly in all groups after RE (P<0.001). Relative RE intensity progression was not significantly different between YS and OS, except for a greater increase in calf raise relative workload observed in YS (P<0.05). In contrast, OR displayed greater relative workload increase in 7 and 6 exercises than YS and OS, respectively (P<0.05). The RE was safe as no injuries or major muscle pain were observed in either group. These results suggest that healthy sedentary older men are capable to exercise and increase RE intensity in the same way as young men, while physically active older men are capable to increase RE intensity in greater way than sedentary young and older men.
我们的目的是研究年龄对男性抗阻运动(RE)强度进展的可能影响。24 名男性,分为年轻久坐(YS;n=10;25.9+/-3.7 岁)、年长久坐(OS;n=7;67.4+/-5.2 岁)和年长跑步者(OR;n=7;71.3+/-3.0 岁),进行了为期 13 周、每周两次的 RE 训练计划。在训练前后,通过 1 次重复最大测试评估肌肉力量。每次训练课程都记录了 RE 工作量,只要出现适应,就会增加 5-10%。RE 后,所有组的肌肉力量都有相似的提高(P<0.001)。YS 和 OS 之间的相对 RE 强度进展没有显著差异,除了 YS 的小腿抬高相对工作量增加较大(P<0.05)。相比之下,OR 在 7 项和 6 项运动中显示出比 YS 和 OS 更大的相对工作量增加(P<0.05)。RE 是安全的,因为在任何一组中都没有观察到受伤或严重肌肉疼痛。这些结果表明,健康的久坐年长男性能够像年轻男性一样运动并增加 RE 强度,而活跃的年长男性能够比久坐的年轻和年长男性以更大的方式增加 RE 强度。