• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

描述重症监护病房的风险概况。

Characterizing the risk profiles of intensive care units.

机构信息

Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos Polivalente, Hospital de Santo António dos Capuchos, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, E.P.E., Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jul;36(7):1207-12. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1852-2. Epub 2010 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00134-010-1852-2
PMID:20306015
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a new method to evaluate the performance of individual ICUs through the calculation and visualisation of risk profiles.

METHODS

The study included 102,561 patients consecutively admitted to 77 ICUs in Austria. We customized the function which predicts hospital mortality (using SAPS II) for each ICU. We then compared the risks of hospital mortality resulting from this function with the risks which would be obtained using the original function. The derived risk ratio was then plotted together with point-wise confidence intervals in order to visualise the individual risk profile of each ICU over the whole spectrum of expected hospital mortality.

MAIN MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

We calculated risk profiles for all ICUs in the ASDI data set according to the proposed method. We show examples how the clinical performance of ICUs may depend on the severity of illness of their patients. Both the distribution of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test statistics and the histogram of the corresponding P values demonstrated a good fit of the individual risk models.

CONCLUSIONS

Our risk profile model makes it possible to evaluate ICUs on the basis of the specific risk for patients to die compared to a reference sample over the whole spectrum of hospital mortality. Thus, ICUs at different levels of severity of illness can be directly compared, giving a clear advantage over the use of the conventional single point estimate of the overall observed-to-expected mortality ratio.

摘要

目的

通过计算和可视化风险概况,开发一种评估个体 ICU 性能的新方法。

方法

该研究纳入了奥地利 77 家 ICU 连续收治的 102561 名患者。我们为每个 ICU 定制了预测医院死亡率的 SAPS II 函数。然后,我们比较了该函数预测的医院死亡率风险与原始函数得到的风险。然后,将得出的风险比与逐点置信区间一起绘制,以可视化每个 ICU 在整个预期医院死亡率范围内的个体风险概况。

主要测量和结果

我们根据提出的方法计算了 ASDI 数据集中所有 ICU 的风险概况。我们展示了 ICU 临床性能如何取决于患者疾病严重程度的示例。Hosmer-Lemeshow 拟合优度检验统计量的分布和相应 P 值的直方图均表明个体风险模型拟合良好。

结论

我们的风险概况模型使得能够根据患者与参考样本相比在整个医院死亡率范围内死亡的特定风险来评估 ICU。因此,可以直接比较不同严重程度的 ICU,这与使用常规的总体观察到的预期死亡率比值的单点估计相比具有明显优势。

相似文献

1
Characterizing the risk profiles of intensive care units.描述重症监护病房的风险概况。
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Jul;36(7):1207-12. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1852-2. Epub 2010 Mar 20.
2
Evaluation of an interdisciplinary data set for national intensive care unit assessment.用于国家重症监护病房评估的跨学科数据集评估
Crit Care Med. 1999 Aug;27(8):1486-91. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199908000-00014.
3
Assessment of the performance of five intensive care scoring models within a large Scottish database.在一个大型苏格兰数据库中对五种重症监护评分模型的性能评估。
Crit Care Med. 2000 Jun;28(6):1820-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200006000-00023.
4
Ratios of observed to expected mortality are affected by differences in case mix and quality of care.观察到的死亡率与预期死亡率的比值受病例组合和医疗质量差异的影响。
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Oct;26(10):1466-72. doi: 10.1007/s001340000638.
5
Performance of Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 In Predicting Hospital Mortality In Emergency Intensive Care Unit.简化急性生理学评分3在预测急诊重症监护病房患者医院死亡率中的表现
Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 Jul 5;130(13):1544-1551. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.208250.
6
Rating the quality of intensive care units: is it a function of the intensive care unit scoring system?评估重症监护病房的质量:这是重症监护病房评分系统的一项功能吗?
Crit Care Med. 2002 Sep;30(9):1976-82. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200209000-00005.
7
Outcome prediction in intensive care: results of a prospective, multicentre, Portuguese study.重症监护中的预后预测:一项前瞻性、多中心的葡萄牙研究结果。
Intensive Care Med. 1997 Feb;23(2):177-86. doi: 10.1007/s001340050313.
8
Evaluation of two outcome prediction models on an independent database.在一个独立数据库上对两种结果预测模型进行评估。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Jan;26(1):50-61. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199801000-00016.
9
Evaluation of intensive care unit performance in Lithuania using the SAPS II system.使用简化急性生理学评分系统(SAPS II)评估立陶宛重症监护病房的绩效。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2004 Aug;21(8):619-24. doi: 10.1017/s0265021504008063.
10
Performance evaluation of APACHE II score for an Indian patient with respiratory problems.用于评估印度呼吸疾病患者的急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)的性能评价
Indian J Med Res. 2004 Jun;119(6):273-82.

引用本文的文献

1
[Reimbursement of intensive care services in the German DRG system : Current problems and possible solutions].[德国疾病诊断相关分组系统中重症监护服务的报销:当前问题与可能的解决方案]
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2018 Feb;113(1):13-23. doi: 10.1007/s00063-017-0390-x. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
2
Intensive care performance: How should we monitor performance in the future?重症监护表现:我们未来应如何监测表现?
World J Crit Care Med. 2014 Nov 4;3(4):74-9. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v3.i4.74.
3
How objective is the observed mortality following critical care?

本文引用的文献

1
Patient volume affects outcome in critically ill patients.患者数量会影响重症患者的治疗结果。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2009;121(1-2):34-40. doi: 10.1007/s00508-008-1019-0.
2
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today's critically ill patients.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)IV:当今危重症患者的医院死亡率评估
Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1297-310. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000215112.84523.F0.
3
SAPS 3--From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 1: Objectives, methods and cohort description.
重症监护后的观察到的死亡率有多客观?
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Nov;39(11):2047-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3079-5. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
4
Prospectively defined indicators to improve the safety and quality of care for critically ill patients: a report from the Task Force on Safety and Quality of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM).前瞻性定义的指标,以提高危重病患者的护理安全性和质量:来自欧洲危重病医学会(ESICM)安全与质量工作组的报告。
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Apr;38(4):598-605. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2462-3. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
5
Year in review in Intensive Care Medicine 2010: I. Acute renal failure, outcome, risk assessment and ICU performance, sepsis, neuro intensive care and experimentals.《2010年重症医学年度回顾:I. 急性肾衰竭、预后、风险评估与重症监护病房表现、脓毒症、神经重症监护及实验研究》
Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jan;37(1):19-34. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2112-1. Epub 2011 Jan 4.
简化急性生理学评分系统3——从患者评估到重症监护病房评估。第1部分:目标、方法和队列描述。
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Oct;31(10):1336-44. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2762-6. Epub 2005 Aug 17.
4
SAPS 3--From evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the intensive care unit. Part 2: Development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission.简化急性生理学评分系统3(SAPS 3)——从患者评估到重症监护病房评估。第2部分:重症监护病房入院时医院死亡率预后模型的开发。
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Oct;31(10):1345-55. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-2763-5. Epub 2005 Aug 17.
5
More interventions do not necessarily improve outcome in critically ill patients.更多的干预措施不一定能改善重症患者的预后。
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Aug;30(8):1586-93. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2154-8. Epub 2004 Feb 26.
6
Patient volume, staffing, and workload in relation to risk-adjusted outcomes in a random stratified sample of UK neonatal intensive care units: a prospective evaluation.英国新生儿重症监护病房随机分层样本中与风险调整后结局相关的患者数量、人员配备和工作量:一项前瞻性评估
Lancet. 2002 Jan 12;359(9301):99-107. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(02)07366-x.
7
Nursing staff in intensive care in Europe: the mismatch between planning and practice.欧洲重症监护病房的护理人员:规划与实践之间的差距。
Chest. 1998 Mar;113(3):752-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.113.3.752.
8
Monitoring the results of cardiac surgery by variable life-adjusted display.通过可变寿命调整显示监测心脏手术结果。
Lancet. 1997 Oct 18;350(9085):1128-30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)06507-0.
9
The effectiveness of right heart catheterization in the initial care of critically ill patients. SUPPORT Investigators.右心导管检查在危重症患者初始治疗中的有效性。支持研究人员。
JAMA. 1996 Sep 18;276(11):889-97. doi: 10.1001/jama.276.11.889.
10
A new Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study.基于一项欧洲/北美多中心研究的新型简化急性生理学评分(SAPS II)。
JAMA. 1993;270(24):2957-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.270.24.2957.