Timmers Tim K, Verhofstad Michiel Hj, Moons Karl Gm, Leenen Luke Ph
Tim K Timmers, Luke PH Leenen, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
World J Crit Care Med. 2014 Nov 4;3(4):74-9. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v3.i4.74.
Intensive care faces economic challenges. Therefore, evidence proving both effectiveness and efficiency, i.e., cost-effectiveness, of delivered care is needed. Today, the quality of care is an important issue in the health care debate. How do we measure quality of care and how accurate and representative is this measurement? In the following report, several topics which are used for the evaluation of intensive care unit (ICU) performance are discussed: (1) The use of general outcome prediction models to determine the risk of patients who are admitted to ICUs in an increasing variety of case mix for the different intensive care units, together with three major limitations; (2) As critical care outcomes research becomes a more established entity, mortality is now only one of many endpoints that are relevant. Mortality is a limited outcome when assessing critical care performance, while patient interest in quality of life outcomes is relevant; and (3) The Quality Indicators Committee of the Society of Critical Care Medicine recommended that short-term readmission is a major performance indicator of the quality of intensive care medicine.
重症监护面临经济挑战。因此,需要有证据证明所提供护理的有效性和效率,即成本效益。如今,护理质量是医疗保健辩论中的一个重要问题。我们如何衡量护理质量,以及这种衡量的准确性和代表性如何?在以下报告中,将讨论用于评估重症监护病房(ICU)绩效的几个主题:(1)使用一般结局预测模型来确定因不同重症监护病房病例组合日益多样化而入住ICU的患者的风险,以及三个主要局限性;(2)随着重症监护结局研究成为一个更成熟的实体,死亡率现在只是众多相关终点之一。在评估重症监护绩效时,死亡率是一个有限的结局,而患者对生活质量结局的关注是相关的;以及(3)危重病医学会质量指标委员会建议,短期再入院是重症监护医学质量的一项主要绩效指标。