Australian Catholic University, Faculty of the Health Sciences, North Sydney, Australia.
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2010 Mar;5(1):103-16. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.5.1.103.
Traditional talent development pathways for adolescents in team sports follow talent identification procedures based on subjective games ratings and isolated athletic assessment. Most talent development models are exclusive rather than inclusive in nature. Subsequently, talent identification may result in discontentment, premature stratification, or dropout from team sports. Understanding the multidimensional differences among the requirements of adolescent and elite adult athletes could provide more realistic goals for potential talented players. Coach education should include adolescent development, and rewards for team success at the adolescent level should reflect the needs of long-term player development. Effective talent development needs to incorporate physical and psychological maturity, the relative age effect, objective measures of game sense, and athletic prowess. The influences of media and culture on the individual, and the competing time demands between various competitions for player training time should be monitored and mediated where appropriate. Despite the complexity, talent development is a worthy investment in professional team sport.
传统的青少年团队运动人才发展途径遵循基于主观比赛评分和孤立运动评估的人才识别程序。大多数人才发展模式本质上是排他性的，而不是包容性的。因此，人才识别可能导致不满、过早分层或退出团队运动。了解青少年和精英成年运动员的需求的多维差异，可以为有潜力的运动员提供更现实的目标。教练教育应包括青少年发展，青少年层面的团队成功奖励应反映长期球员发展的需要。有效的人才发展需要结合身体和心理成熟度、相对年龄效应、比赛意识的客观衡量标准以及运动能力。应监测和适当调解媒体和文化对个人的影响，以及各种比赛之间对球员训练时间的竞争时间需求。尽管复杂，但人才发展是职业团队运动的一项有价值的投资。
