Altrecht, Institute for Mental Health Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Schizophr Res. 2010 Jun;119(1-3):27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.02.1059. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
Several studies have reported increased incidence rates of psychotic disorders among immigrant groups. Surprisingly, the cross-cultural validity of the diagnostic instruments that were used was never tested.
To examine whether the incidence rates of psychotic disorders including schizophrenia among Moroccan immigrants to the Netherlands remain increased when a cultural sensitive diagnostic interview is used.
We compared first contact incidence with a standard and a cultural sensitive version of a diagnostic interview.
Age and gender adjusted relative risk for psychotic disorders and schizophrenia among Moroccans compared to native Dutch was 7.9 (95% CI 4.7-13.5) and 7.8 (95% CI 4.0-15.2) respectively based on the standard diagnostic interview and 4.2 (95% CI 2.3-7.9) and 1.5 (0.5-4.3) respectively based on the cultural sensitive version the diagnostic interview.
First contact incidence of schizophrenia among Moroccans was no longer significantly higher than among ethnic Dutch people when a cultural sensitive diagnostic procedure was applied.
多项研究报告称,移民群体中出现精神障碍的发病率有所上升。令人惊讶的是,这些被使用的诊断工具的跨文化有效性从未经过测试。
检验在使用文化敏感的诊断访谈时,荷兰移民中的精神障碍(包括精神分裂症)发病率是否仍然升高。
我们比较了标准诊断访谈和文化敏感诊断访谈的首次接触发病率。
基于标准诊断访谈,与荷兰本地人相比,摩洛哥裔的精神障碍和精神分裂症的年龄和性别调整相对风险分别为 7.9(95%CI 4.7-13.5)和 7.8(95%CI 4.0-15.2);而基于文化敏感诊断访谈,该相对风险分别为 4.2(95%CI 2.3-7.9)和 1.5(0.5-4.3)。
当使用文化敏感的诊断程序时,摩洛哥裔的精神分裂症首次接触发病率不再显著高于荷兰裔。