• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新诊断 2 型糖尿病患者使用阿司匹林的成本效益。

Cost-effectiveness of aspirin use among persons with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

机构信息

Division of Diabetes Translation, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun;33(6):1193-9. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1888. Epub 2010 Mar 23.

DOI:10.2337/dc09-1888
PMID:20332350
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2875422/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of aspirin use among adults aged >or=40 years with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We used a validated cost-effectiveness model of type 2 diabetes to assess the lifetime health and cost consequences of use or nonuse of aspirin. The model simulates the progression of diabetes and accompanying complications for a cohort of subjects with type 2 diabetes. The model predicts the outcomes of type 2 diabetes along five disease paths (nephropathy, neuropathy, retinopathy, coronary heart disease, and stroke) from the time of diagnosis until age 94 years or until death.

RESULTS

Over a lifetime, aspirin users gained 0.31 life-years (LY) or 0.19 quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs) over nonaspirin users, at an incremental cost of $1,700; the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of aspirin use was $5,428 per LY gained or $8,801 per QALY gained. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, the ICER was <$30,000 per QALY in all of 2,000 realizations in two scenarios.

CONCLUSIONS

Regular use of aspirin among people with newly diagnosed diabetes is cost-effective.

摘要

目的

评估新诊断 2 型糖尿病成人患者使用阿司匹林的长期成本效益。

研究设计与方法

我们使用经过验证的 2 型糖尿病成本效益模型来评估阿司匹林使用或不使用对患者终生健康和成本的影响。该模型模拟了一组 2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病进展及其伴随并发症。该模型根据五种疾病路径(肾病、神经病变、视网膜病变、冠心病和中风),从诊断时间到 94 岁或死亡,预测 2 型糖尿病的结果。

结果

在一生中,阿司匹林使用者比非阿司匹林使用者多获得 0.31 个生命年(LY)或 0.19 个质量调整生命年(QALY),增量成本为 1700 美元;阿司匹林使用的增量成本效益比(ICER)为每获得 1 LY 增加 5428 美元,每获得 1 QALY 增加 8801 美元。在概率敏感性分析中,在两种情况下的 2000 次实现中,ICER 均<30000 美元/QALY。

结论

在新诊断为糖尿病的人群中,常规使用阿司匹林具有成本效益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c30e/2875422/0e89a608e565/zdc0061082890001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c30e/2875422/0e89a608e565/zdc0061082890001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c30e/2875422/0e89a608e565/zdc0061082890001.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of aspirin use among persons with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes.新诊断 2 型糖尿病患者使用阿司匹林的成本效益。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Jun;33(6):1193-9. doi: 10.2337/dc09-1888. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
2
Cost-Effectiveness of Empagliflozin for the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus at Increased Cardiovascular Risk in Greece.依帕列净治疗伴心血管风险升高的希腊 2 型糖尿病患者的成本效果分析。
Clin Drug Investig. 2018 May;38(5):417-426. doi: 10.1007/s40261-018-0620-x.
3
Lifetime health consequences and cost-effectiveness of rosiglitazone in combination with metformin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Spain.罗格列酮联合二甲双胍治疗西班牙2型糖尿病的终生健康后果及成本效益
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24 Suppl 1:49-59. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624001-00005.
4
The cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin versus sulfonylurea as an add-on to metformin in the treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus.达格列净与磺脲类药物作为二甲双胍治疗2型糖尿病附加用药的成本效益分析
Diabet Med. 2015 Jul;32(7):890-8. doi: 10.1111/dme.12772. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
5
Cost-effectiveness of dapagliflozin versus DPP-4 inhibitors as an add-on to Metformin in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus from a UK Healthcare System Perspective.从英国医疗保健系统角度看,达格列净与二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂作为二甲双胍附加治疗2型糖尿病的成本效益
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Nov 5;15:496. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1139-y.
6
Economic evaluation of clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome patients without ST-segment elevation in Greece: a cost-utility analysis.希腊无 ST 段抬高急性冠状动脉综合征患者氯吡格雷的经济学评价:成本-效用分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2012 Jul 1;10(4):261-71. doi: 10.2165/11633820-000000000-00000.
7
Cost-effectiveness of intensive glycemic control, intensified hypertension control, and serum cholesterol level reduction for type 2 diabetes.强化血糖控制、强化血压控制及降低血清胆固醇水平对2型糖尿病的成本效益分析
JAMA. 2002 May 15;287(19):2542-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.19.2542.
8
PROactive 06: cost-effectiveness of pioglitazone in Type 2 diabetes in the UK.PROactive 06:吡格列酮在英国2型糖尿病治疗中的成本效益
Diabet Med. 2007 Sep;24(9):982-1002. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02188.x. Epub 2007 Jun 25.
9
Repaglinide : a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in type 2 diabetes mellitus.瑞格列奈:对其在2型糖尿病治疗中应用的药物经济学综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2004;22(6):389-411. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200422060-00005.
10
Clopidogrel Versus Aspirin for the Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome After a 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis From China Payer's Perspective.氯吡格雷与阿司匹林治疗双抗血小板治疗 12 个月后的急性冠状动脉综合征:中国支付方视角的成本效果分析。
Clin Ther. 2018 Dec;40(12):2125-2137. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Net Clinical Benefit of Oral Anticoagulation Among Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation.老年房颤患者口服抗凝治疗的净临床获益
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Nov;12(11):e006212. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.119.006212. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
2
Quality of Diabetes Care in Germany Improved from 2000 to 2007 to 2014, but Improvements Diminished since 2007. Evidence from the Population-Based KORA Studies.德国糖尿病护理质量在2000年至2007年至2014年期间有所改善,但自2007年以来改善程度有所下降。基于人群的KORA研究的证据。
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 17;11(10):e0164704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164704. eCollection 2016.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events in people with diabetes: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.阿司匹林用于糖尿病患者心血管事件的一级预防:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
BMJ. 2009 Nov 6;339:b4531. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4531.
2
Using costs in cost-effectiveness models for chronic diseases: lessons from diabetes.在慢性病成本效益模型中使用成本:糖尿病的经验教训。
Med Care. 2009 Jul;47(7 Suppl 1):S21-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181a2bf32.
3
Should aspirin be used for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in people with diabetes?
Risk threshold for starting low dose aspirin in pregnancy to prevent preeclampsia: an opportunity at a low cost.
孕期开始使用低剂量阿司匹林预防子痫前期的风险阈值:一个低成本的契机。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 19;10(3):e0116296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116296. eCollection 2015.
4
Aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus.阿司匹林用于糖尿病的心血管疾病一级预防。
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2010 Nov;6(11):619-28. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2010.169. Epub 2010 Sep 21.
阿司匹林是否应用于糖尿病患者心血管疾病的一级预防?
Med J Aust. 2009 Jun 1;190(11):614-5. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02587.x.
4
Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials.阿司匹林用于血管疾病的一级和二级预防:来自随机试验的个体参与者数据的协作荟萃分析
Lancet. 2009 May 30;373(9678):1849-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60503-1.
5
Low-dose aspirin for primary prevention of atherosclerotic events in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.低剂量阿司匹林用于2型糖尿病患者动脉粥样硬化事件的一级预防:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2008 Nov 12;300(18):2134-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.623. Epub 2008 Nov 9.
6
The prevention of progression of arterial disease and diabetes (POPADAD) trial: factorial randomised placebo controlled trial of aspirin and antioxidants in patients with diabetes and asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease.预防动脉疾病和糖尿病进展(POPADAD)试验:糖尿病和无症状外周动脉疾病患者中阿司匹林和抗氧化剂的析因随机安慰剂对照试验。
BMJ. 2008 Oct 16;337:a1840. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1840.
7
The impact of prevention on reducing the burden of cardiovascular disease.预防对减轻心血管疾病负担的影响。
Circulation. 2008 Jul 29;118(5):576-85. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.190186. Epub 2008 Jul 7.
8
Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women: a cost-utility analysis.阿司匹林用于女性心血管疾病的一级预防:一项成本效益分析。
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Feb 12;167(3):290-5. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.3.290.
9
Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: United States, 1988-2002.糖尿病护理流程及中间结果的改善:美国,1988 - 2002年
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Apr 4;144(7):465-74. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-7-200604040-00005.
10
Aspirin, statins, or both drugs for the primary prevention of coronary heart disease events in men: a cost-utility analysis.阿司匹林、他汀类药物或两者联合用于男性冠心病事件一级预防的成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Mar 7;144(5):326-36. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-5-200603070-00007.