Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Melbourne, Australia.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011 Jan;67(1):153-63. doi: 10.1007/s00280-010-1303-3. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
The objective of this study was to conduct a randomised phase II study in second-line metastatic colorectal cancer with the purpose of confirming preliminary clinical data indicating that the formulation of irinotecan with the drug carrier, hyaluronan (HA) reduced toxicity of the drug.
Irinotecan-naïve patients were randomized to receive either irinotecan (350 mg/m(2)) or HA-Irinotecan (HA 1,000 mg/m(2) and irinotecan at 350 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks for a maximum of eight cycles.
Seventy-six patients (41 HA-Irinotecan and 35 irinotecan-alone) were enrolled. There was no significant difference in any individual, or overall, grade 3 or 4 toxicity. There was a trend for increased diarrhea in the HA-Irinotecan-treated patients (20 versus 9%; P = 21), potentially explained by a disproportionate number of baseline toxicity-associated risk factors in this treatment group. The median number of cycles completed was six for HA-Irinotecan patients and two for irinotecan-alone patients (P = 0.005). When compared to the control arm, HA-Irinotecan patients had a significantly longer median progression-free survival of 5.2 versus 2.4 months (P = 0.017) and time to treatment failure (4 vs. 1.8 months; P = 0.007). Median overall survival was 10.1 months for HA-Irinotecan compared to 8.0 months for irinotecan patients (P = 0.196).
Further studies are required to define the safety of the formulation of irinotecan with HA. While this study was not adequately powered to demonstrate survival differences, these phase II data indicated HA-Irinotecan to be a promising therapy demonstrating improved efficacy compared to irinotecan-alone.
本研究的目的是在二线转移性结直肠癌中进行一项随机 II 期研究,旨在证实初步临床数据表明,伊立替康与药物载体透明质酸(HA)联合使用可降低药物毒性。
将伊立替康初治患者随机分为接受伊立替康(350mg/m²)或 HA-伊立替康(HA 1000mg/m²和伊立替康 350mg/m²)治疗,每 3 周一次,最多 8 个周期。
共纳入 76 例患者(HA-伊立替康 41 例,伊立替康单药治疗 35 例)。两组患者各单项或总体 3 或 4 级毒性均无显著差异。HA-伊立替康组腹泻发生率呈增加趋势(20%比 9%;P=0.021),可能与该治疗组基线毒性相关危险因素比例较高有关。HA-伊立替康组患者完成的中位周期数为 6 个,而伊立替康单药组为 2 个(P=0.005)。与对照组相比,HA-伊立替康组患者的中位无进展生存期显著延长(5.2 个月比 2.4 个月;P=0.017)和治疗失败时间(4 个月比 1.8 个月;P=0.007)。HA-伊立替康组患者的中位总生存期为 10.1 个月,而伊立替康组为 8.0 个月(P=0.196)。
需要进一步研究来确定伊立替康与 HA 联合使用的安全性。虽然本研究没有足够的效能来证明生存差异,但这些 II 期数据表明,HA-伊立替康是一种很有前途的治疗方法,与伊立替康单药治疗相比,疗效有所提高。