Department of Cardiology, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Jun;26(5):541-5. doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9610-7. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
Reliable echocardiographic markers additional to plasma biomarkers that would establish prognosis of chronic heart failure and guide therapeutic approach would be beneficial. In our hypothesis, echocardiographic assessment of coronary sinus anatomic alteration, which has been ignored, may be part of remodeling process in heart failure. We also aimed to evaluate relationship between coronary sinus anatomic alteration and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. We echocardiographically analysed 112 patients with heart failure and 61 normal subjects. Left/right ventricular volumes, left atrial area and mean coronary sinus were measured. Coronary sinus diameter was significantly higher in patients than in control group. Statistically positive correlation were present between coronary sinus measurements and left/right ventricular volumes (R = 0.5, P < 0.001; R = 0.4, P < 001, respectively), left atrial area (R = 0.6, P < 0.001), NYHA class (R = 0.3, P < 0.001), mitral regurgitation (R = 0.329, P < 0.001), tricuspid regurgitation (R = 0.215, P < 0.02) and left ventricular mass (R = 0.482, P < 0.001). Statistically negative correlation were present between coronary sinus measurements and left ventricle ejection fraction (R = -0.4, P < 0.001). However, coronary sinus diameter was not correlated with body surface area and pulmonary artery pressure. Tricuspid and mitral regurgitation, left ventricular mass, ejection fraction and functional class were included in multivariate analysis and only ejection fraction was independent predictor of coronary sinus diameter (P = 0.012). We demonstrated that, dilated coronary sinus is possibly a part of entire process of cardiac remodeling and echocardiographic assessment of dilated coronary sinus may provide useful additional information, predicting the severity of chronic heart failure and poor functional class.
除了血浆生物标志物外,还需要可靠的超声心动图标志物来确定慢性心力衰竭的预后并指导治疗方法。我们假设,被忽视的冠状窦解剖改变的超声心动图评估可能是心力衰竭重构过程的一部分。我们还旨在评估冠状窦解剖改变与左心室收缩功能障碍之间的关系。我们对 112 例心力衰竭患者和 61 例正常对照进行了超声心动图分析。测量左/右心室容积、左心房面积和平均冠状窦。与对照组相比,患者的冠状窦直径明显更高。冠状窦测量值与左/右心室容积(R = 0.5,P < 0.001;R = 0.4,P < 001)、左心房面积(R = 0.6,P < 0.001)、纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级(R = 0.3,P < 0.001)、二尖瓣反流(R = 0.329,P < 0.001)、三尖瓣反流(R = 0.215,P < 0.02)和左心室质量(R = 0.482,P < 0.001)呈统计学正相关。冠状窦测量值与左心室射血分数(R = -0.4,P < 0.001)呈统计学负相关。然而,冠状窦直径与体表面积和肺动脉压无关。三尖瓣和二尖瓣反流、左心室质量、射血分数和功能分级纳入多变量分析,只有射血分数是冠状窦直径的独立预测因子(P = 0.012)。我们证明,扩张的冠状窦可能是整个心脏重构过程的一部分,扩张的冠状窦的超声心动图评估可能提供有用的额外信息,预测慢性心力衰竭的严重程度和较差的功能分级。