• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钬激光(波长=2120纳米)与铥光纤激光(波长=1908纳米)碎石术的对比

Holmium:YAG (lambda = 2,120 nm) versus thulium fiber (lambda = 1,908 nm) laser lithotripsy.

作者信息

Blackmon Richard L, Irby Pierce B, Fried Nathaniel M

机构信息

Department of Physics and Optical Science, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, North Carolina 28223-000, USA.

出版信息

Lasers Surg Med. 2010 Mar;42(3):232-6. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20893.

DOI:10.1002/lsm.20893
PMID:20333745
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The holmium:YAG laser is currently the most common laser lithotripter. However, recent experimental studies have demonstrated that the thulium fiber laser is also capable of vaporizing urinary stones. The high-temperature water absorption coefficient for the thulium wavelength (mu(a) = 160 cm(-1) at lambda = 1,908 nm) is significantly higher than for the holmium wavelength (mu(a) = 28 cm(-1) at lambda = 2,120 nm). We hypothesize that this should translate into more efficient laser lithotripsy using the thulium fiber laser. This study directly compares stone vaporization rates for holmium and thulium fiber lasers.

METHODS

Holmium laser radiation pulsed at 3 Hz with 70 mJ pulse energy and 220 microseconds pulse duration was delivered through a 100-microm-core silica fiber to human uric acid (UA) and calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) stones, ex vivo (n = 10 each). Thulium fiber laser radiation pulsed at 10 Hz with 70 mJ pulse energy and 1-millisecond pulse duration was also delivered through a 100-microm fiber for the same sets of 10 stones each.

RESULTS

For the same number of pulses and total energy (126 J) delivered to each stone, the mass loss averaged 2.4+/-0.6 mg (UA) and 0.7+/-0.2 mg (COM) for the holmium laser and 12.6+/-2.5 mg (UA) and 6.8+/-1.7 (COM) for the thulium fiber laser.

CONCLUSIONS

UA and COM stone vaporization rates for the thulium fiber laser averaged 5-10 times higher than for the holmium laser at 70 mJ pulse energies. With further development, the thulium fiber laser may represent an alternative to the conventional holmium laser for more efficient laser lithotripsy.

摘要

引言

钬激光目前是最常用的激光碎石设备。然而,最近的实验研究表明,铥光纤激光也能够汽化尿路结石。铥波长的高温水吸收系数(在λ = 1908 nm时μ(a)=160 cm(-1))显著高于钬波长(在λ = 2120 nm时μ(a)=28 cm(-1))。我们推测,这意味着使用铥光纤激光进行激光碎石术效率更高。本研究直接比较了钬激光和铥光纤激光的结石汽化率。

方法

钬激光以3 Hz的频率脉冲发射,脉冲能量为70 mJ,脉冲持续时间为220微秒,通过一根100微米芯径的石英光纤传输至人体尿酸(UA)结石和一水草酸钙(COM)结石,均为体外实验(每种结石各10个)。铥光纤激光以10 Hz的频率脉冲发射,脉冲能量为70 mJ,脉冲持续时间为1毫秒,同样通过一根100微米光纤传输至相同的每组10个结石。

结果

对于传输至每个结石的相同脉冲数和总能量(126 J),钬激光导致的质量损失平均为2.4±0.6 mg(UA结石)和0.7±0.2 mg(COM结石),而铥光纤激光导致的质量损失平均为12.6±2.5 mg(UA结石)和6.8±1.7 mg(COM结石)。

结论

在70 mJ脉冲能量下,铥光纤激光对UA和COM结石的汽化率平均比钬激光高5至10倍。随着进一步发展,铥光纤激光可能成为传统钬激光更高效激光碎石术的替代方案。

相似文献

1
Holmium:YAG (lambda = 2,120 nm) versus thulium fiber (lambda = 1,908 nm) laser lithotripsy.钬激光(波长=2120纳米)与铥光纤激光(波长=1908纳米)碎石术的对比
Lasers Surg Med. 2010 Mar;42(3):232-6. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20893.
2
Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy using tapered fibers.使用锥形光纤的铥光纤激光碎石术
Lasers Surg Med. 2010 Jan;42(1):45-50. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20883.
3
Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: an in vitro analysis of stone fragmentation using a modulated 110-watt Thulium fiber laser at 1.94 microm.铥光纤激光碎石术:使用1.94微米波长的110瓦调制铥光纤激光对结石破碎的体外分析
Lasers Surg Med. 2005 Jul;37(1):53-8. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20196.
4
Comparison of holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: ablation thresholds, ablation rates, and retropulsion effects.钬:YAG 和铥光纤激光碎石术的比较:消融阈值、消融速率和后向推力效应。
J Biomed Opt. 2011 Jul;16(7):071403. doi: 10.1117/1.3564884.
5
Preclinical comparison of superpulse thulium fiber laser and a holmium:YAG laser for lithotripsy.超脉冲铥光纤激光与钬:YAG 激光碎石术的临床前比较。
World J Urol. 2020 Feb;38(2):497-503. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02785-9. Epub 2019 May 4.
6
Fiber-optic manipulation of urinary stone phantoms using holmium:YAG and thulium fiber lasers.光纤操纵应用钬:YAG 和掺铥光纤激光处理尿路结石模型。
J Biomed Opt. 2013 Feb;18(2):28001. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.18.2.028001.
7
Erbium: YAG versus holmium:YAG lithotripsy.铒:钇铝石榴石激光与钬:钇铝石榴石激光碎石术
J Urol. 2001 Mar;165(3):876-9.
8
Enhanced thulium fiber laser lithotripsy using micro-pulse train modulation.采用微脉冲串调制增强铥光纤激光碎石术。
J Biomed Opt. 2012 Feb;17(2):028002. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.2.028002.
9
Pulsed Thulium:YAG laser - What is the lithotripsy ablation efficiency for stone dust from human urinary stones? Results from an in vitro PEARLS study.脉冲铥:钇铝石榴石激光 - 人类尿路结石碎石粉尘的碎石消融效率如何?来自体外 PEARLS 研究的结果。
World J Urol. 2023 Dec;41(12):3723-3730. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04640-4. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
10
Erbium:YAG laser lithotripsy using hybrid germanium/silica optical fibers.使用锗/二氧化硅混合光纤的铒钇铝石榴石激光碎石术。
J Endourol. 2004 Nov;18(9):830-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2004.18.830.

引用本文的文献

1
Vapour bubbles produced by long-pulsed laser: a race between advection and phase transition.长脉冲激光产生的蒸汽泡:平流与相变之间的竞争。
J Fluid Mech. 2024 Nov 25;999. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2024.989. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
2
Simulation of the temperature distribution of kidney stones induced by thulium fiber laser and Ho: YAG laser lithotripsy.铥光纤激光和钬激光碎石术引起的肾结石温度分布模拟
Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Dec 17;39(1):297. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04255-0.
3
Clinical efficacy and safety of the superpulse thulium fiber laser and holmium laser for ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi: a randomized, positive control, blinded, single-center clinical study {1}.
超脉冲铥光纤激光和钬激光用于输尿管镜碎石术治疗上尿路结石的临床疗效和安全性:一项随机、阳性对照、盲法、单中心临床研究 {1}。
Trials. 2024 Nov 25;25(1):796. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08362-9.
4
Ablation efficiency and laser safety of a novel superpulsed thulium fiber laser: a in vitro study.新型超脉冲铥光纤激光的消融效率和激光安全性:体外研究。
World J Urol. 2024 Oct 4;42(1):561. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05266-w.
5
Comparative study of thulium fiber laser versus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser for ureteric stone management with semi-rigid ureteroscopy: A prospective, single-center study.铥光纤激光与钬:钇铝石榴石激光在半硬性输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石中的对比研究:一项前瞻性单中心研究。
Asian J Urol. 2024 Jul;11(3):460-465. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.01.001. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
6
Flexible ureteroscopic treatment of kidney stones: How do the new laser systems change our concepts?柔性输尿管镜治疗肾结石:新型激光系统如何改变我们的观念?
Asian J Urol. 2024 Apr;11(2):156-168. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.11.001. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
7
In vitro investigation of stone ablation efficiency, char formation, spark generation, and damage mechanism produced by thulium fiber laser.体外研究钬光纤激光碎石效率、炭化形成、火花产生和损伤机制。
Urolithiasis. 2023 Nov 2;51(1):124. doi: 10.1007/s00240-023-01501-y.
8
Thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: Is it living up to the hype?铥光纤激光碎石术:它是否名副其实?
Asian J Urol. 2023 Jul;10(3):289-297. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.11.003. Epub 2022 Dec 30.
9
Comparing dusting and fragmenting efficiency using the new SuperPulsed thulium fiber laser versus a 120 W Holmium:YAG laser.比较新型超脉冲铥光纤激光与 120 W 钬:YAG 激光的粉碎和粉碎效率。
Investig Clin Urol. 2023 May;64(3):265-271. doi: 10.4111/icu.20230071.
10
In Pursuit of the Optimal Dusting Settings with the Thulium Fiber Laser: An Assessment.追求铥光纤激光的最佳粉尘设置:评估。
J Endourol. 2023 Aug;37(8):914-920. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0168. Epub 2023 Jun 26.