Comparative study of thulium fiber laser versus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser for ureteric stone management with semi-rigid ureteroscopy: A prospective, single-center study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of thulium fiber laser (TFL) and holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser for ureteric stone management with semi-rigid ureteroscopy.

METHODS

In a prospective study from January 2020 to December 2021, we compared 40 patients in each group who underwent semi-rigid ureteroscopic lithotripsy with TFL and that with Ho:YAG laser. Stone volume, stone density, stone fragmentation rates, total lasing time, total operative time, endoscopic vision, retropulsion and stone free rates were analyzed in both groups and compared.

RESULTS

Mean stone volume was comparable in the TFL group and the Ho:YAG laser group (282.45 [standard deviation, SD 139.79] mm 279.49 [SD 312.52] mm; =0.964). Mean stone density was also comparable in the TFL group and the Ho:YAG laser group (1135.30 [SD 317.04] Hounsfield unit 1131.75 [SD 283.03] Hounsfield unit; =0.959). The mean stone fragmentation rates calculated as stone volume divided by lasing time were 25.85 (SD 10.61) mm/min and 21.37 (SD 14.13) mm/min in the TFL group and the Ho:YAG laser group, respectively (=0.113). The mean total lasing time (10.15 [SD] 4.69 min 11.43 [SD 4.56] min; =0.222), mean operative time (25.13 [SD 9.51] min 25.54 [SD 10.32] min; =0.866), and mean total hospital stay (2.62 [SD 0.77] days 2.61 [SD 0.84] days; =0.893) were comparable in the TFL group and in the Ho:YAG group. The vision was better and retropulsion was less in the TFL group. The stone-free rate at 1 month postoperatively was slightly better in the TFL group (100% 90%; =0.095).

CONCLUSION

TFL technology was associated with the comparable total surgical time, total lasing time, and stone fragmentation rate with Ho:YAG laser. However, TFL had better endoscopic vision, lesser stone retropulsion, and slightly better stone-free rates.