Psychiatry Research Unit of Cantabria, IFIMAV, CIBERSAM, University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
Schizophr Res. 2010 Jun;119(1-3):18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.02.1072. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
In apparent contradiction to the notion of cognitive impairment as a core feature of schizophrenia, some studies have described a subgroup of patients neuropsychologically within normal limits. It remains to be determined whether this subgroup has intact cognitive functioning or a higher premorbid functioning that attenuates the evidence of deterioration. Out of a total of 111 patients with FES or schizophreniform disorder, 25 (23%) were classified as cognitive normal (CN) according to criteria based on performance in six basic cognitive dimensions and an overall composite score, and their cognitive profile was compared with that of 28 controls. The CN subgroup had better social premorbid adjustment and had a higher premorbid IQ than the cognitive impaired subgroup. There were no differences in the other pretreatment variables examined. The CN subgroup performed similarly to controls in the cognitive dimensions, including sustained attention, verbal memory and executive functions. These profiles remained mostly unaltered after controlling for premorbid IQ. The cognitive deterioration index, calculated by ratio of performance in general knowledge and vocabulary abilities to a measure of processing speed , showed that both patient subgroups had similar levels of deterioration and that this was significantly different to that of controls. Although FES patients performed within normal limits and better than cognitive impaired patients in a processing speed task, they did nevertheless display a pattern of deterioration in processing speed (in relation to their premorbid IQ) equivalent to that of those with marked impairments.
与精神分裂症的认知障碍核心特征概念明显矛盾的是,一些研究在神经心理学上描述了亚组患者处于正常范围内。目前仍有待确定该亚组是否具有完整的认知功能,或者是否具有更高的潜在功能,从而减轻了恶化的证据。在总共 111 名 FES 或精神分裂症样障碍患者中,根据基于六个基本认知维度和整体综合评分的表现的标准,有 25 名(23%)被归类为认知正常(CN),并比较他们的认知特征与 28 名对照者的认知特征。CN 亚组在社会前期调整方面表现较好,且前期智商高于认知受损亚组。在其他检查的预处理变量中,没有差异。CN 亚组在认知维度(包括持续注意力、言语记忆和执行功能)的表现与对照组相似。在控制前期智商后,这些特征大多保持不变。通过将一般知识和词汇能力的表现与处理速度测量值进行比较计算出的认知恶化指数表明,两个患者亚组都有相似的恶化水平,与对照组的差异显著。尽管 FES 患者在处理速度任务中表现正常,且优于认知受损患者,但他们的处理速度(与他们的前期智商有关)确实表现出与那些明显受损的患者相当的恶化模式。