Department of Animal- and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, N-1432 As, Norway.
J Dairy Sci. 2010 Apr;93(4):1578-86. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2752.
The objective was to test if there was an association between free-stall base softness and milk yield, incidence of clinical mastitis (CM), teat lesions, and removal of cows. In a questionnaire sent to 1,923 dairy farms presumed to be using free-stall housing, farmers were asked for information regarding housing and stall base; for example, the year of installation and the product name or brand of their mats or mattresses. This information was merged with data for milk yield, CM, teat lesions, and removal of cows extracted from the Norwegian Dairy Herd Recording System for the years after installation of mats or mattresses. After exclusion of invalid contributions, the data set consisted of 29,326 lactations for milk yield distributed over 363 free-stalled herds in Norway. The farms were stratified into 5 categories according to the softness of the stall surface measured as millimeter impact of a sphere with a diameter of 120 mm at 2-kN load: 1=concrete, softness of 0mm; 2=rubber, softness of 1 to 8mm; 3=soft mats, softness of 9 to 16 mm; 4=multilayer mats, softness of 17 to 24 mm; and 5=mattresses, softness over 24 mm. Lactation curves were estimated as modified Wood's lactation curves using test-day data and mixed models with repeated measurements, adjusting for days in milk, parity, and softness of free-stall flooring. Herds on concrete free-stall bases yielded 6,727+/-146 kg of milk from 5 to 305 days in milk. In comparison, herds showed a decrease of 0.3% on rubber, an increase of 2.4% on soft mats, an increase of 4.5% on multilayer mats, and an increase of 3.9% on mattresses. Compared with concrete, the hazard ratio (HR) of CM was less on rubber, multilayer mats, and mattresses [HR=0.89 (0.79-0.99), 0.85 (0.73-0.996), and 0.80 (0.73-0.88), respectively]. Compared with concrete, the HR of teat lesions was less on rubber, soft mats, multilayer mats, and mattresses [HR=0.41 (0.26-0.65), 0.33 (0.24-0.44), 0.12 (0.04-0.38), and 0.47 (0.33-0.67), respectively]. The HR of removal of cows was less on mattresses compared with concrete, rubber, soft mats, and multilayer mats, with HR=0.90 (0.84-0.97), 0.88 (0.80-0.97), 0.86 (0.80-0.93), and 0.85 (0.76-0.95), respectively. A soft free-stall base contributed significantly to increased milk yield and fewer incidences of CM, teat lesions, and removal of cows.
本研究旨在检验卧床柔软度与产奶量、临床型乳腺炎(CM)、乳头损伤和奶牛淘汰之间是否存在关联。我们向 1923 家疑似使用卧床饲养的奶牛场发送了一份问卷,询问有关卧床和卧床底座的信息;例如,安装年份以及他们的垫料或床垫的产品名称或品牌。这些信息与从挪威奶牛 herd 记录系统中提取的产奶量、CM、乳头损伤和奶牛淘汰数据合并。在排除无效数据后,数据集包括了分布在挪威 363 个卧床中的 29326 个泌乳期的产奶量数据。根据 120mm 直径球体在 2kN 载荷下的冲击毫米数,将农场分为 5 个卧床表面柔软度类别:1=混凝土,柔软度为 0mm;2=橡胶,柔软度为 1 至 8mm;3=柔软垫料,柔软度为 9 至 16mm;4=多层垫料,柔软度为 17 至 24mm;5=床垫,柔软度超过 24mm。使用测试日数据和重复测量的混合模型,根据泌乳天数、胎次和卧床地板柔软度对泌乳曲线进行了估计。在混凝土卧床基础上的泌乳期奶牛从泌乳第 5 天到第 305 天的产奶量为 6727+/-146kg。相比之下,橡胶、柔软垫料、多层垫料和床垫的产奶量分别增加了 0.3%、2.4%、4.5%和 3.9%。与混凝土相比,CM 的危害比(HR)在橡胶、多层垫料和床垫上分别降低了 0.89(0.79-0.99)、0.85(0.73-0.996)和 0.80(0.73-0.88)。与混凝土相比,橡胶、柔软垫料、多层垫料和床垫上乳头损伤的 HR 分别降低了 0.41(0.26-0.65)、0.33(0.24-0.44)、0.12(0.04-0.38)和 0.47(0.33-0.67)。与混凝土、橡胶、柔软垫料和多层垫料相比,床垫上奶牛淘汰的 HR 降低了 0.90(0.84-0.97)、0.88(0.80-0.97)、0.86(0.80-0.93)和 0.85(0.76-0.95)。柔软的卧床基础显著提高了产奶量,减少了 CM、乳头损伤和奶牛淘汰的发生。