Suppr超能文献

聚乙二醇化重组人血管内皮抑制素钠对比聚乙二醇化重组人血管内皮抑制素钠联合黄斑激光光凝或单纯激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿

Pegaptanib Sodium versus Pegaptanib Sodium Combined with Macular Laser Photocoagulation or Laser Alone for Diabetic Macular Edema.

作者信息

Querques G, Bux A V, Fusco A R, Iaculli C, Delle Noci N

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Ospedali Riuniti, University of Foggia, Viale Pinto, 1 71100, Foggia, Italy.

出版信息

J Ophthalmol. 2009;2009:672178. doi: 10.1155/2009/672178. Epub 2010 Mar 9.

Abstract

Purpose. To report the outcomes after primary intravitreal pegaptanib sodium in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods. We conduced a retrospective analysis of eyes with DME treated with primary intravitreal pegaptanib sodium (Macugen) (intravitreal pegaptanib group). The results were compared with the ones of eyes treated with intravitreal pegaptanib sodium associated with macular laser photocoagulation (combined treatment group), and the ones of eyes treated with primary macular laser photocoagulation (macular laser photocoagulation group). Results. For the intravitreal pegaptanib group (13 eyes), we found significant changes in mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and reductions in mean central macular thickness (CMT) at the last follow-up visit (P = .0014 and P = .0001). For the macular laser photocoagulation group (15 eyes), we found no statistically significant changes in mean BCVA and CMT at the last follow-up visit (P > .05). For the combined treatment group (12 eyes), we found no significant changes in mean BCVA at the last follow-up visit (P > .05) despite significant reductions in mean CMT (P = .0188). Conclusion. Intravitreal pegaptanib treatment alone may be superior to macular laser photocoagulation alone and to combined intravitreal pegaptanib treatment associated with macular laser photocoagulation in patients with DME.

摘要

目的。报告糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)患者接受初次玻璃体内注射培加他尼钠后的治疗结果。方法。我们对接受初次玻璃体内注射培加他尼钠(Macugen)治疗的DME患眼(玻璃体内注射培加他尼组)进行了回顾性分析。将结果与接受玻璃体内注射培加他尼钠联合黄斑激光光凝治疗的患眼(联合治疗组)以及接受初次黄斑激光光凝治疗的患眼(黄斑激光光凝组)的结果进行比较。结果。对于玻璃体内注射培加他尼组(13只眼),我们发现在最后一次随访时平均最佳矫正视力(BCVA)有显著变化,平均中心黄斑厚度(CMT)降低(P = 0.0014和P = 0.0001)。对于黄斑激光光凝组(15只眼),我们发现在最后一次随访时平均BCVA和CMT无统计学显著变化(P > 0.05)。对于联合治疗组(12只眼),尽管平均CMT显著降低(P = 0.0188),但在最后一次随访时平均BCVA无显著变化(P > 0.05)。结论。对于DME患者,单纯玻璃体内注射培加他尼治疗可能优于单纯黄斑激光光凝以及玻璃体内注射培加他尼联合黄斑激光光凝治疗。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
What we don't know about avastin might hurt us.我们对阿瓦斯汀不了解的方面可能会对我们不利。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Oct;124(10):1478-9. doi: 10.1001/archopht.124.10.1478.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验