文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

内镜治疗是否适用于表浅型黏膜下食管腺癌?食管切除术标本的分析。

Are endoscopic therapies appropriate for superficial submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma? An analysis of esophagectomy specimens.

机构信息

Division of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Apr;210(4):418-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.003.


DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.003
PMID:20347733
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic resection and ablation have advanced the treatment of intramucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma and have been promoted as definitive therapy for selected superficial submucosal tumors. Controversy exists regarding the prevalence of nodal metastases at various depths of mucosal and submucosal invasion. Our aim was to clarify this prevalence and identify predictors of nodal spread. STUDY DESIGN: An expert gastrointestinal pathologist retrospectively reviewed 54 T1 adenocarcinomas from 258 esophagectomy specimens (2000 to 2008). Tumors were classified as intramucosal or submucosal, the latter being subclassified as SM1 (upper third), SM2 (middle third), or SM3 (lower third) based on the depth of tumor invasion. The depth of invasion was correlated with the prevalence of positive nodes. Fisher's exact test and univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to identify variables predicting nodal disease. RESULTS: Nodal metastases were present in 0% (0 of 25) of intramucosal, 21% (3 of 14) of SM1, 36% (4 of 11) of SM2, and 50% (2 of 4) of SM3 tumors. The differences were significant between intramucosal and submucosal tumors (p < 0.0001), although not between the various subclassifications of submucosal tumors (p = 0.503). Univariate logistic regression identified poor differentiation (p = 0.024), lymphovascular invasion (p = 0.049), and number of harvested lymph nodes (p = 0.037) as significantly correlated with nodal disease. Multivariate logistic regression did not identify any of the tested variables as independent predictors of the prevalence of positive lymph nodes. CONCLUSIONS: All depths of submucosal invasion of esophageal adenocarcinoma were associated with an unacceptably high prevalence of nodal metastases and a marked increase relative to intramucosal cancer. Accurate predictors of nodal spread, independent of tumor depth, are currently lacking and will be necessary before recommending endoscopic resection with or without concomitant ablation as curative treatment for even superficial submucosal neoplasia.

摘要

背景:内镜下切除和消融技术的进步推动了黏膜内食管腺癌的治疗,并被推荐为选择的黏膜下浅层肿瘤的根治性治疗方法。在不同黏膜和黏膜下浸润深度的淋巴结转移的发生率方面存在争议。我们的目的是阐明这种发生率并确定淋巴结转移的预测因素。

研究设计:一位胃肠病理专家回顾性分析了 2000 年至 2008 年间 258 例食管切除标本中的 54 例 T1 腺癌。肿瘤分为黏膜内或黏膜下,后者根据肿瘤浸润深度分为 SM1(上三分之一)、SM2(中三分之一)或 SM3(下三分之一)。肿瘤浸润深度与阳性淋巴结的发生率相关。采用 Fisher 确切检验和单因素及多因素逻辑回归分析来确定预测淋巴结疾病的变量。

结果:0%(25 例中 0 例)的黏膜内、21%(14 例中 3 例)的 SM1、36%(11 例中 4 例)的 SM2 和 50%(4 例中 2 例)的 SM3 肿瘤存在淋巴结转移。黏膜内和黏膜下肿瘤之间的差异有统计学意义(p<0.0001),但黏膜下肿瘤的各种亚分类之间无差异(p=0.503)。单因素逻辑回归分析确定低分化(p=0.024)、血管淋巴管侵犯(p=0.049)和采集的淋巴结数量(p=0.037)与淋巴结疾病显著相关。多因素逻辑回归分析未确定任何测试变量是阳性淋巴结发生率的独立预测因素。

结论:食管腺癌的所有黏膜下浸润深度均与淋巴结转移的发生率高且明显高于黏膜内癌有关。目前缺乏独立于肿瘤深度的淋巴结转移的准确预测因素,在推荐内镜下切除联合或不联合消融作为治疗甚至是浅层黏膜下肿瘤的根治性治疗之前,这些预测因素是必要的。

相似文献

[1]
Are endoscopic therapies appropriate for superficial submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma? An analysis of esophagectomy specimens.

J Am Coll Surg. 2010-4

[2]
Multifocal neoplasia and nodal metastases in T1 esophageal carcinoma: implications for endoscopic treatment.

Ann Surg. 2008-3

[3]
Endoscopic mucosal resection as a staging technique to determine the depth of invasion of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Ann Thorac Surg. 2004-11

[4]
The prevalence of lymph node metastases in patients with T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma a retrospective review of esophagectomy specimens.

Ann Surg. 2011-2

[5]
Prediction of lymph node status in superficial esophageal carcinoma.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2008-11

[6]
Prevalence of lymph node metastases in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013-8-26

[7]
Evaluation of endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal carcinoma.

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2000-12

[8]
Risk of lymph node metastasis in submucosal esophageal cancer: a review of surgically resected patients.

Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011-6

[9]
Clinicopathologic features of superficial esophageal cancer: results of consecutive 100 patients.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2008-1

[10]
Lymph node metastasis in early esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Ann Surg. 2011-11

引用本文的文献

[1]
Lymph Node Metastasis for pN+ Superficial Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Thorac Cancer. 2025-1

[2]
Optimizing management for early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma: longitudinal results from a multidisciplinary program.

Surg Endosc. 2023-10

[3]
The 8th Wonder of the Cancer World: Esophageal Cancer and Inflammation.

Diseases. 2022-7-7

[4]
Barrett's esophagus: Review of natural history and comparative efficacy of endoscopic and surgical therapies.

World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2022-3-15

[5]
Clinicopathologic correlations of superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma in endoscopic submucosal dissection specimens.

Diagn Pathol. 2021-11-27

[6]
Endoscopic therapies for Barrett's esophagus.

Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021-10-25

[7]
Endoscopic resection of Barrett's adenocarcinoma: Intramucosal and low-risk tumours are not associated with lymph node metastases.

United European Gastroenterol J. 2021-4

[8]
Risk of Recurrence and Metastasis for Patients with T1N0M0 Esophageal Carcinoma Who Achieve Completed Resection via Endoscopic Submucosal Resection: Evidence for the Appropriateness of the Watch and Wait Follow-Up Strategy.

Cancer Manag Res. 2020-4-2

[9]
Relationship of lymphovascular invasion with lymph node metastasis and prognosis in superficial esophageal carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC Cancer. 2020-3-4

[10]
Consensus statement of the Hellenic and Cypriot Oesophageal Cancer Study Group on the diagnosis, staging and management of oesophageal cancer.

Updates Surg. 2019-12

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索