Suppr超能文献

气道压力释放通气在重症急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的实际应用——与传统通气支持的比较初步报告

Practical use of airway pressure release ventilation for severe ARDS--a preliminary report in comparison with a conventional ventilatory support.

作者信息

Liu Liangji, Tanigawa Koichi, Ota Kohei, Tamura Tomoko, Yamaga Satoshi, Kida Yoshiko, Kondo Tomohiro, Ishida Makoto, Otani Tadatsugu, Sadamori Takuma, Tsumura Ryu, Takeda Taku, Iwasaki Yasumasa, Hirohashi Nobuyuki

机构信息

Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan.

出版信息

Hiroshima J Med Sci. 2009 Dec;58(4):83-8.

Abstract

Airway pressure release ventilation (APRV) is a ventilatory mode that allows unsupported spontaneous breathing at any phase of the ventilatory cycle with high mean airway pressures. We hypothesized that use of APRV might produce potential beneficial effects on oxygenation, reducing mortality in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in comparison with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) as a conventional mode of ventilation. We retrospectively reviewed data of 58 patients with severe ARDS (the ratios of partial arterial oxygen tension to fraction of inspired oxygen, PaO2/F(I)O2 ratio <150). The patients' data were divided into two groups: SIMV-group and APRV-group. Patients' backgrounds, oxygenation on day 0, 1, 3, 5 and 7 following initiation of each mode, vasopressor dependence, duration of ventilation, duration of ICU stay, and mortality in ICU were analyzed. PaO2/F(I)O2 ratios were statistically higher in the APRV-group (APRV vs. SIMV on day 1, 3, 5, 7: 201.6 +/- 76 vs.150 +/- 59.1, 256.7 +/- 71.5 vs.182.1 +/- 65.4, 268.8 +/- 73.3 vs. 204.6 +/- 72.8, and 263 +/- 74.5 vs. 204.1 +/- 67.1, respectively, p<0.05). Vasopressors were less used (p=0.018), and mortality in ICU tended to be lower in the APRV group (31%) than in the SIMV group (59%) (p=0.050). Use of APRV in patients with severe ARDS appears to be associated with improvements in oxygenation, and a trend toward lower mortality in ICU. No significant adverse effects were observed. Prospective controlled studies are required to confirm the benefits of this ventilatory mode in comparison with conventional methods for severe ARDS.

摘要

气道压力释放通气(APRV)是一种通气模式,它允许在通气周期的任何阶段以较高的平均气道压力进行自主呼吸。我们假设,与作为传统通气模式的同步间歇指令通气(SIMV)相比,使用APRV可能会对氧合产生潜在的有益影响,降低重症急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的死亡率。我们回顾性分析了58例重症ARDS患者(动脉血氧分压与吸入氧分数之比,PaO2/F(I)O2比值<150)的数据。患者数据分为两组:SIMV组和APRV组。分析了患者的背景、每种模式开始后第0、1、3、5和7天的氧合情况、血管升压药的使用情况、通气时间、ICU住院时间以及ICU死亡率。APRV组的PaO2/F(I)O2比值在统计学上更高(APRV组与SIMV组在第1、3、5、7天分别为:201.6±76对150±59.1、256.7±71.5对182.1±65.4、268.8±73.3对204.6±72.8、263±74.5对204.1±67.1,p<0.05)。血管升压药的使用较少(p=0.018),APRV组的ICU死亡率(31%)倾向于低于SIMV组(59%)(p=0.050)。在重症ARDS患者中使用APRV似乎与氧合改善以及ICU死亡率降低的趋势相关。未观察到明显的不良反应。需要进行前瞻性对照研究,以证实这种通气模式与重症ARDS的传统方法相比的益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验