Fredericks Andrew S, Bunker Matthew P, Gliga Louise A, Ebeling Callie G, Ringqvist Jenny Rb, Heravi Hooman, Manley James, Valladares Jason, Romito Bryan T
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Department of Respiratory Care, Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, TX, USA.
Clin Med Insights Circ Respir Pulm Med. 2020 Feb 5;14:1179548420903297. doi: 10.1177/1179548420903297. eCollection 2020.
To review the theoretical benefits of airway pressure release ventilation (APRV), summarize the evidence for its use in clinical practice, and discuss different titration strategies.
Published randomized controlled trials in humans, observational human studies, animal studies, review articles, ventilator textbooks, and editorials.
Airway pressure release ventilation optimizes alveolar recruitment, reduces airway pressures, allows for spontaneous breathing, and offers many hemodynamic benefits. Despite these physiologic advantages, there are inconsistent data to support the use of APRV over other modes of ventilation. There is considerable heterogeneity in the application of APRV among providers and a shortage of information describing initiation and titration strategies. To date, no direct comparison studies of APRV strategies have been performed. This review describes 2 common management approaches that bedside providers can use to optimally tailor APRV to their patients.
Airway pressure release ventilation remains a form of mechanical ventilation primarily used for refractory hypoxemia. It offers unique physiological advantages over other ventilatory modes, and providers must be familiar with different titration methods. Given its inconsistent outcome data and heterogeneous use in practice, future trials should directly compare APRV strategies to determine the optimal management approach.
回顾气道压力释放通气(APRV)的理论益处,总结其在临床实践中应用的证据,并讨论不同的滴定策略。
已发表的人体随机对照试验、人体观察性研究、动物研究、综述文章、呼吸机教科书及社论。
气道压力释放通气可优化肺泡复张,降低气道压力,允许自主呼吸,并带来诸多血流动力学益处。尽管有这些生理优势,但支持APRV优于其他通气模式的数据并不一致。提供者在应用APRV方面存在相当大的异质性,且缺乏关于启动和滴定策略的信息。迄今为止,尚未进行APRV策略的直接比较研究。本综述描述了床边提供者可用于为患者最佳调整APRV的两种常见管理方法。
气道压力释放通气仍然是一种主要用于难治性低氧血症的机械通气形式。它比其他通气模式具有独特的生理优势,提供者必须熟悉不同的滴定方法。鉴于其结果数据不一致且在实践中使用存在异质性,未来试验应直接比较APRV策略以确定最佳管理方法。