Department of Neuroradiology, Alfried-Krupp-Krankenhaus, Alfried Krupp Strasse 21, 45131, Essen, Germany.
Neuroradiology. 2010 Jul;52(7):633-44. doi: 10.1007/s00234-010-0678-5. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
Intracranial stenting is increasingly used as an add-on to medical therapy despite the fact that the overall clinical benefit remains a matter of debate, since we lack results of randomized trials. Decision making on interventional treatment is made on the grounds of the anticipated risk of stroke with antiplatelet medication on one hand and on the experience with stent treatment based on data from case series and registries on the other hand. This review will summarize the current knowledge on both topics serving as the fundament of patient selection for intracranial stenting. A second objective is to highlight some specific problems that are encountered when treating patients interventionally. Procedure-related complication rates and rates of in stent stenoses are still too high to be confident that endovascular treatment is superior to medical therapy of symptomatic stenoses. Optimization of patient selection criteria, stent technology, and periprocedural management are necessary to become undoubtedly competitive with antiplatelet therapy. With the current stage of development, interventional treatment of intracranial stenoses should be confined to specialized centers with a high expertise in neurovascular procedures.
尽管缺乏随机试验的结果,颅内支架置入术作为一种附加的药物治疗手段,其整体临床获益仍存在争议,但目前该技术的应用越来越多。介入治疗的决策是基于抗血小板药物治疗的预期卒中风险,以及基于病例系列和登记数据的支架治疗经验。本文综述了这两个主题的现有知识,为颅内支架置入术的患者选择提供基础。第二个目的是强调在介入治疗患者时遇到的一些具体问题。与药物治疗症状性狭窄相比,血管内治疗的优势仍不明确,因为与操作相关的并发症发生率和支架内狭窄发生率仍然过高。需要优化患者选择标准、支架技术和围手术期管理,以具有明显的竞争优势。在目前的发展阶段,颅内狭窄的介入治疗应仅限于具有神经血管介入专业知识的专业中心。