Corbridge Susan J, Robinson F Patrick, Tiffen Jennifer, Corbridge Thomas C
University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2010;7:Article12. doi: 10.2202/1548-923X.1976. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
Patient simulation is increasingly used in the education of healthcare providers, yet few studies have compared simulation to other teaching modalities. The purpose of this study was to determine differences in knowledge acquisition and student satisfaction between two methods of teaching the principles of mechanical ventilation to advanced practice nursing (APN) students: high-fidelity patient simulation (including face-to-face instruction) versus an online, narrated PowerPoint presentation. Twenty APN students were randomized to either the simulation or online teaching method in this pre/posttest study. Measures included a 12-item knowledge questionnaire and a 5-item satisfaction survey. Both groups had significant improvement in knowledge scores from pretest to posttest, but knowledge scores were not significantly different at posttest between groups. Student satisfaction with their learning method was significantly higher in the simulation group. Students choosing to participate in the alternative teaching method after study completion preferred the simulation to the online method.
患者模拟在医护人员的教育中越来越多地被使用,但很少有研究将模拟与其他教学方式进行比较。本研究的目的是确定在向高级实践护理(APN)学生教授机械通气原理的两种方法之间,知识获取和学生满意度的差异:高保真患者模拟(包括面对面指导)与在线旁白PowerPoint演示文稿。在这项前测/后测研究中,20名APN学生被随机分配到模拟或在线教学方法。测量包括一份12项的知识问卷和一份5项的满意度调查。两组从前测到后测的知识分数都有显著提高,但两组在后测时的知识分数没有显著差异。模拟组学生对其学习方法的满意度显著更高。在研究完成后选择参与替代教学方法的学生更喜欢模拟而不是在线方法。