Department of Sports Medicine, Medical Clinic, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
High Alt Med Biol. 2010 Spring;11(1):19-25. doi: 10.1089/ham.2009.1019.
In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, we tested a 4-week program in normobaric hypoxia that is commercially offered for the prevention of acute mountain sickness (AMS). Twenty-two male and 18 female healthy subjects [mean age 33 +/- 7 (SD) years] exercised 70 min, 3 x /week for 3 weeks on a bicycle ergometer at workloads of 60% VO2max either in normoxia (normoxia group, NG) or in normobaric hypoxia (hypoxia group, HG), corresponding to altitudes of 2500, 3000, and 3500 m during weeks 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Four passive exposures of 90 min in normoxia (NG) or hypoxia corresponding to 4500 m (HG) followed in week 4. Five days after the last session, subjects ascended within 24 h from sea level to 4559 m (one overnight stay at 3611 m) and stayed there for 24 h. AMS was defined as LL (Lake Louise score) > or =5 and AMS-C > or =0.70. The AMS incidence (70% in NG vs. 60% in HG, p = 0.74), LL scores (7.1 +/- 4.3 vs. 5.9 +/- 3.4, p = 0.34), and AMS-C scores (1.50 +/- 1.22 vs. 0.93 +/- 0.81, p = 0.25) at the study endpoint were not significantly different between the groups. However, the incidence of AMS at 3611 m (6% vs. 47%, p = 0.01) and the functional LL score at 4559 m were lower in HG. SpO2 at 3611 m, heart rate during ascents, and arterial blood gases at 4559 m were not different between groups. We conclude that the tested program does not reduce the incidence of AMS within a rapid ascent to 4559 m, but our data show that it prevents AMS at lower altitudes. Whether such a program would prevent AMS at higher altitudes, but with slower ascent, remains to be tested.
在一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲研究中,我们测试了一项为期 4 周的常压低氧方案,该方案是为预防急性高原病 (AMS) 而商业化提供的。22 名男性和 18 名女性健康受试者[平均年龄 33 +/- 7(SD)岁]在自行车测力计上每周 3 次、每次 70 分钟,以 60%VO2max 的工作量进行 3 周的运动,分别在第 1、2 和 3 周处于常氧(常氧组,NG)或常压低氧(低氧组,HG),分别对应海拔 2500、3000 和 3500 米。第 4 周进行了 4 次各 90 分钟的常压被动暴露(NG)或对应 4500 米的低氧暴露(HG)。最后一次训练后 5 天,受试者在 24 小时内从海平面上升至 4559 米(在 3611 米处过夜停留),并在那里停留 24 小时。AMS 定义为 LL(路易斯湖评分)>或=5 和 AMS-C>或=0.70。AMS 的发病率(NG 为 70%,HG 为 60%,p=0.74)、LL 评分(7.1 +/- 4.3 与 5.9 +/- 3.4,p=0.34)和 AMS-C 评分(1.50 +/- 1.22 与 0.93 +/- 0.81,p=0.25)在研究终点时,两组之间无显著差异。然而,HG 组在 3611 米时的 AMS 发病率(6%与 47%,p=0.01)和在 4559 米时的功能 LL 评分较低。在 3611 米时的 SpO2、上升过程中的心率和 4559 米时的动脉血气无组间差异。我们的结论是,所测试的方案并不能降低在快速上升至 4559 米时 AMS 的发病率,但我们的数据表明,它可以预防较低海拔的 AMS。这样的方案是否可以预防更高海拔但上升速度较慢的 AMS,还有待测试。