Centre for Health Services and Nursing Research, Catholic University Leuven, Kapucijnenvoer 35 4th floor, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Feb;16(1):39-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01111.x.
SUMMARY RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Clinical pathways are globally used to improve quality and efficiency of care. Total joint arthroplasty patients are one of the primary target groups for clinical pathway development. Despite the worldwide use of clinical pathways, it is unclear which key interventions multidisciplinary teams select as pathway components, which outcomes they measures and what the effect of this complex intervention is. This literature study is aimed at three research questions: (1) What are the key interventions used in joint arthroplasty clinical pathways? (2) Which outcome measures are used? (3) What are the effects of a joint arthroplasty clinical pathway?
Systematic literature review using a multiple reviewer approach. Five electronic databases were searched comprehensively. Reference lists were screened. Experts were consulted. After application of inclusion and exclusion criteria and critical appraisal, 34 of the 4055 publications were included.
Joint arthroplasty clinical pathways address pre-admission education, pre-admission exercises, pre-admission assessment and testing, admission and surgical procedure, postoperative rehabilitation, minimal manipulation, symptoms management, thrombosis prophylaxis, discharge management, primary caregiver involvement, home-based physiotherapy and continuous follow-up. An overview of target dimensions and corresponding indicators is provided. Clinical pathways for joint arthroplasty could improve process and financial outcomes. The effects on clinical outcome are mixed. Evidence on team and service outcome is lacking.
A set of key interventions and outcome measures is available to support joint arthroplasty clinical pathways. Team and service outcomes should be further addressed in practice and research. Meta-analysis on the outcome indicators should be performed. Future studies should more rigorously comply with existing reporting standards.
描述、说明和确定临床路径的基本原理、目的和目标。临床路径在全球范围内被用于提高医疗护理的质量和效率。全膝关节置换术患者是临床路径开发的主要目标人群之一。尽管全球范围内都在使用临床路径,但尚不清楚多学科团队选择哪些关键干预措施作为路径组成部分,他们衡量哪些结果,以及这种复杂干预的效果如何。本文献研究旨在回答三个研究问题:(1)全膝关节置换术临床路径中使用了哪些关键干预措施?(2)使用了哪些结局指标?(3)全膝关节置换术临床路径的效果如何?
采用多位审阅者的系统文献综述方法。全面搜索了 5 个电子数据库。筛选参考文献列表。咨询专家。在应用纳入和排除标准以及进行批判性评价后,从 4055 篇文献中纳入了 34 篇。
全膝关节置换术临床路径涉及入院前教育、入院前锻炼、入院前评估和检查、入院和手术、术后康复、最小化操作、症状管理、血栓预防、出院管理、主要照顾者参与、家庭物理治疗和持续随访。提供了目标维度和相应指标的概述。全膝关节置换术临床路径可以改善流程和财务结果。对临床结局的影响是混合的。缺乏团队和服务结果的证据。
有一系列关键干预措施和结局指标可用于支持全膝关节置换术临床路径。团队和服务结果应在实践和研究中进一步解决。应该对结局指标进行荟萃分析。未来的研究应更严格地遵守现有的报告标准。