Suppr超能文献

稳态模型评估胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)用于代谢综合征诊断的最佳切点:伊朗第三次非传染性疾病危险因素全国监测(SuRFNCD-2007)。

Optimal cut-off of homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) for the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome: third national surveillance of risk factors of non-communicable diseases in Iran (SuRFNCD-2007).

机构信息

Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center (EMRC), Vali-Asr Hospital, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Nutr Metab (Lond). 2010 Apr 7;7:26. doi: 10.1186/1743-7075-7-26.

Abstract

AIM

We have recently determined the optimal cut-off of the homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance for the diagnosis of insulin resistance (IR) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) in non-diabetic residents of Tehran, the capital of Iran. The aim of the present study is to establish the optimal cut-off at the national level in the Iranian population with and without diabetes.

METHODS

Data of the third National Surveillance of Risk Factors of Non-Communicable Diseases, available for 3,071 adult Iranian individuals aging 25-64 years were analyzed. MetS was defined according to the Adult Treatment Panel III (ATPIII) and International Diabetes Federation (IDF) criteria. HOMA-IR cut-offs from the 50th to the 95th percentile were calculated and sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood ratio for MetS diagnosis were determined. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of HOMA-IR for MetS diagnosis were depicted, and the optimal cut-offs were determined by two different methods: Youden index, and the shortest distance from the top left corner of the curve.

RESULTS

The area under the curve (AUC) (95%CI) was 0.650 (0.631-0.670) for IDF-defined MetS and 0.683 (0.664-0.703) with the ATPIII definition. The optimal HOMA-IR cut-off for the diagnosis of IDF- and ATPIII-defined MetS in non-diabetic individuals was 1.775 (sensitivity: 57.3%, specificity: 65.3%, with ATPIII; sensitivity: 55.9%, specificity: 64.7%, with IDF). The optimal cut-offs in diabetic individuals were 3.875 (sensitivity: 49.7%, specificity: 69.6%) and 4.325 (sensitivity: 45.4%, specificity: 69.0%) for ATPIII- and IDF-defined MetS, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We determined the optimal HOMA-IR cut-off points for the diagnosis of MetS in the Iranian population with and without diabetes.

摘要

目的

我们最近确定了稳态模型评估胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)在伊朗首都德黑兰非糖尿病居民中诊断胰岛素抵抗(IR)和代谢综合征(MetS)的最佳截断值。本研究的目的是在有和没有糖尿病的伊朗人群中建立最佳截断值。

方法

分析了可用于 3071 名 25-64 岁伊朗成年人的第三次全国非传染性疾病危险因素监测数据。MetS 根据成人治疗小组 III(ATPIII)和国际糖尿病联合会(IDF)标准定义。计算了 HOMA-IR 从第 50 到第 95 百分位的截断值,并确定了 MetS 诊断的敏感性、特异性和阳性似然比。绘制了 HOMA-IR 对 MetS 诊断的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,并通过两种不同的方法确定了最佳截断值:Youden 指数和曲线左上角的最短距离。

结果

IDF 定义的 MetS 的曲线下面积(AUC)(95%CI)为 0.650(0.631-0.670),ATPIII 定义的 MetS 为 0.683(0.664-0.703)。非糖尿病个体中,IDF 和 ATPIII 定义的 MetS 的最佳 HOMA-IR 截断值分别为 1.775(敏感性:57.3%,特异性:65.3%,ATPIII;敏感性:55.9%,特异性:64.7%,IDF)。糖尿病个体中,ATPIII 和 IDF 定义的 MetS 的最佳截断值分别为 3.875(敏感性:49.7%,特异性:69.6%)和 4.325(敏感性:45.4%,特异性:69.0%)。

结论

我们确定了伊朗有和没有糖尿病人群中诊断 MetS 的最佳 HOMA-IR 截断值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fcb/2857836/16b727e7140b/1743-7075-7-26-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验