The Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Kiel, 24113 Kiel, Germany.
J Headache Pain. 2010 Jun;11(3):215-25. doi: 10.1007/s10194-010-0192-5. Epub 2010 Apr 8.
Several meta-analyses have demonstrated that the combination of electrical muscle activity and Temperature Biofeedback could be regarded as gold standard in chronic pediatric headaches. However, these techniques seem to be uneconomical and furthermore they are not directed to improve the social competence as well as resolve possible impairments in daily activities of the child. Therefore, multi-modal behavioral techniques have been proposed, but no studies comparing these with the gold standard were conducted. The present study compared the impact of a new multi-modal behavioral education and training program--MIPAS-Family--with a combined Biofeedback treatment, evaluating clinical efficacy as well as the effect on the quality of life (QoL) of children with chronic headaches. Thirty-four children and adolescents with recurrent headache, ranging from 7 to 16 years, were randomly assigned to the MIPAS-Family (N = 19) or the Biofeedback (N = 15) condition. All patients were diagnosed by the criteria of the International Headache Society. The children and their parents completed headache diaries, diaries of daily living activities and a QoL questionnaire (KINDL). Both groups showed significant improvements concerning the headache intensity and headache duration. We found no significant differences in the main headache parameters between both treatments. After the treatments, the children were less disturbed by their headaches in the domains school, homework, and leisure time. In conclusion, MIPAS-Family is as effective as Biofeedback but it is more cost-effective and addresses the whole family and the daily activities.
几项荟萃分析表明,电肌肉活动和温度生物反馈的结合可以被视为慢性儿科头痛的金标准。然而,这些技术似乎不经济实惠,而且它们也不能提高儿童的社交能力,也不能解决他们在日常生活中可能出现的障碍。因此,已经提出了多模式行为技术,但没有比较这些技术与金标准的研究。本研究比较了一种新的多模式行为教育和培训计划——MIPAS-Family 与联合生物反馈治疗对慢性头痛儿童的影响,评估了临床疗效以及对儿童生活质量(QoL)的影响。34 名患有复发性头痛的儿童和青少年(年龄 7 至 16 岁)被随机分配到 MIPAS-Family(N=19)或生物反馈(N=15)组。所有患者均根据国际头痛协会的标准诊断。儿童及其父母填写头痛日记、日常生活活动日记和生活质量问卷(KINDL)。两组在头痛强度和头痛持续时间方面均有显著改善。我们在两种治疗方法的主要头痛参数之间没有发现显著差异。治疗后,儿童在头痛对学业、家庭作业和休闲时间的干扰方面减少了。总之,MIPAS-Family 与生物反馈一样有效,但它更具成本效益,并且针对整个家庭和日常生活。