• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

暂封材料对黏结材料的抗剪粘结强度的影响。

Effect of temporary cements on the shear bond strength of luting cements.

机构信息

Ribeirão Preto Dental School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Appl Oral Sci. 2010 Jan-Feb;18(1):30-6. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572010000100007.

DOI:10.1590/s1678-77572010000100007
PMID:20379679
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5349037/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate, by shear bond strength (SBS) testing, the influence of different types of temporary cements on the final cementation using conventional and self-etching resin-based luting cements.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty human teeth divided in two halves were assigned to 8 groups (n=10): I and V (no temporary cementation); II and VI: Ca(OH)2-based cement; III and VII: zinc oxide (ZO)-based cement; IV and VIII: ZO-eugenol (ZOE)-based cement. Final cementation was done with RelyX ARC cement (groups I to IV) and RelyX Unicem cement (groups V to VIII). Data were analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test at 5% significance level.

RESULTS

Means were (MPa): I - 3.80 (+/-1.481); II - 5.24 (+/-2.297); III - 6.98 (+/-1.885); IV - 6.54 (+/-1.459); V - 5.22 (+/-2.465); VI - 4.48 (+/-1.705); VII - 6.29 (+/-2.280); VIII - 2.47 (+/-2.076). Comparison of the groups that had the same temporary cementation (Groups II and VI; III and VII; IV and VIII) showed statistically significant difference (p<0.001) only between Groups IV and VIII, in which ZOE-based cements were used. The use of either Ca(OH)2-based (Groups II and VI) or ZO-based (Groups III and VII) cements showed no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) for the different luting cements (RelyX ARC and RelyX Unicem). The groups that had no temporary cementation (Groups I and V) did not differ significantly from each other either (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

When temporary cementation was done with ZO- or ZOE-based cements and final cementation was done with RelyX ARC, there was an increase in the SBS compared to the control. In the groups cemented with RelyX Unicem, however, the use of a ZOE-based temporary cement affected negatively the SBS of the luting agent used for final cementation.

摘要

目的

本研究通过剪切粘结强度(SBS)测试,评估不同类型的暂封材料对使用传统自酸蚀树脂粘结剂进行最终粘结的影响。

材料和方法

将 40 个人工牙分为两半,分为 8 组(n=10):I 组和 V 组(不进行暂封);II 组和 VI 组:氢氧化钙基暂封材料;III 组和 VII 组:氧化锌(ZO)基暂封材料;IV 组和 VIII 组:ZO-丁香酚(ZOE)基暂封材料。最终粘结分别使用 RelyX ARC 粘结剂(I 组至 IV 组)和 RelyX Unicem 粘结剂(V 组至 VIII 组)。数据采用方差分析和 Tukey 检验进行统计学分析,显著性水平为 5%。

结果

平均值(MPa)为:I 组-3.80(+/-1.481);II 组-5.24(+/-2.297);III 组-6.98(+/-1.885);IV 组-6.54(+/-1.459);V 组-5.22(+/-2.465);VI 组-4.48(+/-1.705);VII 组-6.29(+/-2.280);VIII 组-2.47(+/-2.076)。比较具有相同暂封材料的组(II 组和 VI 组;III 组和 VII 组;IV 组和 VIII 组),仅在使用 ZOE 基暂封材料的 IV 组和 VIII 组之间存在统计学显著差异(p<0.001)。使用氢氧化钙基(II 组和 VI 组)或 ZO 基(III 组和 VII 组)暂封材料的组之间,对于不同的粘结剂(RelyX ARC 和 RelyX Unicem),无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。没有进行暂封的组(I 组和 V 组)之间也没有显著差异(p>0.05)。

结论

当使用 ZO 或 ZOE 基暂封材料进行暂封,并用 RelyX ARC 进行最终粘结时,与对照组相比,SBS 增加。然而,在用 RelyX Unicem 粘结时,使用 ZOE 基暂封材料会对最终粘结用的粘结剂的 SBS 产生负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c23c/5349037/e69b324c38e1/jaos-18-01-0030-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c23c/5349037/e69b324c38e1/jaos-18-01-0030-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c23c/5349037/e69b324c38e1/jaos-18-01-0030-g01.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of temporary cements on the shear bond strength of luting cements.暂封材料对黏结材料的抗剪粘结强度的影响。
J Appl Oral Sci. 2010 Jan-Feb;18(1):30-6. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572010000100007.
2
The effect of dentin desensitizer on shear bond strength of conventional and self-adhesive resin luting cements after aging.牙本质脱敏剂对老化后传统和自粘结树脂水门汀剪切粘结强度的影响。
Oper Dent. 2011 Sep-Oct;36(5):492-501. doi: 10.2341/10-292-L. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
3
Effect of temporary cements on the microtensile bond strength of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cement.临时粘结剂对自酸蚀和自粘结树脂粘结剂微拉伸粘结强度的影响。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2014 Nov;72(8):762-9. doi: 10.3109/00016357.2014.903518. Epub 2014 May 19.
4
Shear bond strength between feldspathic CAD/CAM ceramic and human dentine for two adhesive cements.两种粘结剂用于长石质CAD/CAM陶瓷与人类牙本质之间的剪切粘结强度。
J Prosthodont. 2008 Jun;17(4):294-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00294.x. Epub 2008 Feb 5.
5
The effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of luting cements to titanium.不同表面处理方法对钛粘结剂粘结强度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2012 Dec;108(6):370-6. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60194-2.
6
The influence of temporary cements on dental adhesive systems for luting cementation.暂封材料对水门汀粘结系统的影响。
J Dent. 2011 Mar;39(3):255-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Jan 15.
7
Effect of endodontic sealer and resin luting strategies on pull-out bond strength of glass fiber posts to dentin.根管封闭剂和树脂粘结策略对玻璃纤维桩与牙本质拔出粘结强度的影响。
Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2010;23(3):216-21.
8
Microtensile bond strength of new self-adhesive luting agents and conventional multistep systems.新型自粘结黏固剂与传统多步骤系统的微拉伸黏结强度。
J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Nov;102(5):306-12. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60180-3.
9
Effect of surface treatment and type of cement on push-out bond strength of zirconium oxide posts.表面处理及粘结剂类型对氧化锆桩核推出粘结强度的影响
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Oct;112(4):957-63. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.022. Epub 2014 Jun 19.
10
Effect of temporary cements on the bond strength of ceramic luted to dentin.临时水门汀对粘结于牙本质的陶瓷粘结强度的影响。
Dent Mater. 2005 Sep;21(9):794-803. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.01.015.

引用本文的文献

1
Dental Luting Cements: An Updated Comprehensive Review.牙科水门汀:最新全面综述。
Molecules. 2023 Feb 8;28(4):1619. doi: 10.3390/molecules28041619.
2
Effect of temporary cements and their removal methods on the bond strength of indirect restoration: a systematic review and meta-analysis.临时黏固剂及其去除方法对间接修复体粘结强度的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jan;27(1):15-30. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04790-6. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
3
A prospective clinical trial on the influence of a triamcinolone/demeclocycline and a calcium hydroxide based temporary cement on pain perception.

本文引用的文献

1
In vitro comparative bond strength of contemporary self-adhesive resin cements to zirconium oxide ceramic with and without air-particle abrasion.体外比较不同自粘接树脂水门汀与氧化锆陶瓷的粘结强度:有无喷砂处理的差异。
Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Apr;14(2):187-92. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0278-0. Epub 2009 May 5.
2
Selection of luting agents, part 1.粘结剂的选择,第1部分。
J Calif Dent Assoc. 2006 Feb;34(2):149-60.
3
Clinical results of Cerec inlays in a dental practice over a period of 18 years.18年间某牙科诊所Cerec嵌体的临床效果。
一项关于曲安奈德/地美环素和氢氧化钙基暂封材料对疼痛感知影响的前瞻性临床试验。
Head Face Med. 2012 Mar 13;8:9. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-8-9.
Int J Comput Dent. 2006 Jan;9(1):11-22.
4
Influence of eugenol-containing temporary cement on bonding of self-etching adhesives to dentin.含丁香酚的临时水门汀对自酸蚀粘结剂与牙本质粘结的影响。
J Adhes Dent. 2006 Feb;8(1):31-4.
5
A preliminary prospective evaluation of all-ceramic crown-retained and inlay-retained fixed partial dentures.全瓷冠桥和嵌体固位固定局部义齿的初步前瞻性评估。
Int J Prosthodont. 2005 Nov-Dec;18(6):497-505.
6
Effect of temporary cements on the bond strength of ceramic luted to dentin.临时水门汀对粘结于牙本质的陶瓷粘结强度的影响。
Dent Mater. 2005 Sep;21(9):794-803. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.01.015.
7
In vitro retentive strength of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns using different luting agents.使用不同粘结剂的氧化锆陶瓷冠的体外固位强度
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Jun;93(6):551-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.04.011.
8
Influence of temporary cement remnant and surface cleaning method on bond strength to dentin of a composite luting system.临时水门汀残余物及表面清洁方法对复合树脂粘结系统与牙本质粘结强度的影响
J Oral Sci. 2005 Mar;47(1):9-13. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.47.9.
9
Effect of eugenol and non-eugenol containing temporary cement on permanent cement retention and microhardness of cured composite resin.含丁香酚和不含丁香酚的临时粘固剂对固化复合树脂永久粘固力及微硬度的影响。
Dent Mater J. 2003 Dec;22(4):592-9. doi: 10.4012/dmj.22.592.
10
Dentin permeability and eugenol diffusion after full crown preparation.
Am J Dent. 2003 Apr;16(2):112-6.