• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症风险基因检测后,哪些因素促进或阻碍了家庭沟通?一项关于原发性定性研究的系统评价和元综合分析。

What facilitates or impedes family communication following genetic testing for cancer risk? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of primary qualitative research.

作者信息

Chivers Seymour Kim, Addington-Hall Julia, Lucassen Anneke M, Foster Claire L

机构信息

School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Nightingale Building (67), Highfield, Southampton, UK.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2010 Aug;19(4):330-42. doi: 10.1007/s10897-010-9296-y. Epub 2010 Apr 9.

DOI:10.1007/s10897-010-9296-y
PMID:20379768
Abstract

To systematically review and meta-synthesise primary qualitative research findings regarding family communication following genetic testing of cancer risk, in order to inform development of effective interventions. Systematic searches of CINAHL, Embase, Medline, British Nursing Index and PsycINFO databases were undertaken and relevant studies identified using strict criteria. The selected primary qualitative studies were appraised for quality and relevance by three independent researchers and then synthesized using a "Framework" approach. Fourteen (4.3%) studies met the inclusion criteria. The following factors influenced family communication following genetic testing for late-onset hereditary cancer: the informant's feelings about informing relatives about genetic testing; the perceived relevance of the information to other family members and their anticipated reactions; the "closeness" of relationships within the family; family rules and patterns (e.g., who is best placed to share information with whom); finding the right time and level of disclosure; and the supportive role of heath care professionals. The themes identified in this review could provide practitioners with a useful framework for discussing family communication with those undergoing genetic testing. This framework focuses on helping health care professionals to facilitate family communication. The next step will be the development of an intervention to directly support people in talking to their relatives.

摘要

为了系统地回顾和综合关于癌症风险基因检测后家庭沟通的原始定性研究结果,以为有效干预措施的制定提供信息。我们对CINAHL、Embase、Medline、英国护理索引和PsycINFO数据库进行了系统检索,并使用严格标准确定了相关研究。由三位独立研究人员对所选的原始定性研究进行质量和相关性评估,然后采用“框架”方法进行综合。十四项(4.3%)研究符合纳入标准。以下因素影响了迟发性遗传性癌症基因检测后的家庭沟通:告知者对向亲属告知基因检测的感受;信息对其他家庭成员的感知相关性及其预期反应;家庭内部关系的“亲密程度”;家庭规则和模式(例如,谁最适合与谁分享信息);找到合适的披露时间和披露程度;以及医疗保健专业人员的支持作用。本综述中确定的主题可为从业者提供一个有用的框架,用于与接受基因检测的人讨论家庭沟通。该框架侧重于帮助医疗保健专业人员促进家庭沟通。下一步将是开发一种干预措施,以直接支持人们与亲属交谈。

相似文献

1
What facilitates or impedes family communication following genetic testing for cancer risk? A systematic review and meta-synthesis of primary qualitative research.癌症风险基因检测后,哪些因素促进或阻碍了家庭沟通?一项关于原发性定性研究的系统评价和元综合分析。
J Genet Couns. 2010 Aug;19(4):330-42. doi: 10.1007/s10897-010-9296-y. Epub 2010 Apr 9.
2
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
3
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
6
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
7
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
8
Barriers to healthcare professionals recognizing and managing delirium in older adults during a hospital stay: A mixed-methods systematic review.医疗机构专业人员在老年人住院期间识别和管理谵妄的障碍:一项混合方法系统评价。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Jul;80(7):2672-2689. doi: 10.1111/jan.16018. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
9
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
10
The effectiveness of interventions to meet family needs of critically ill patients in an adult intensive care unit: a systematic review update.成人重症监护病房中满足重症患者家庭需求的干预措施的有效性:系统评价更新
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Mar;14(3):181-234. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2477.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing family communication in genetic counseling: A scoping review of process studies.遗传咨询中的家庭沟通问题:过程研究的范围综述
J Genet Couns. 2025 Aug;34(4):e70067. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70067.
2
Family Communication of Genetic Risk: What is it and Why does it Matter?遗传风险的家庭沟通:是什么以及为何重要?
Acta Med Philipp. 2025 Jun 30;59(8):7-15. doi: 10.47895/amp.vi0.9721. eCollection 2025.
3
Healthcare provider-mediated cascade testing of Lynch syndrome to at-risk family members: an interview study.医疗服务提供者介导的林奇综合征高危家庭成员级联检测:一项访谈研究

本文引用的文献

1
Living with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer; experiences from and impact of genetic testing.遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌患者的生活;基因检测的经历与影响
J Genet Couns. 2007 Dec;16(6):811-20. doi: 10.1007/s10897-007-9117-0. Epub 2007 Aug 18.
2
How often do BRCA mutation carriers tell their young children of the family's risk for cancer? A study of parental disclosure of BRCA mutations to minors and young adults.携带BRCA基因突变的人多久会告知他们年幼的孩子家族患癌风险?一项关于向未成年人和年轻人披露BRCA基因突变的父母情况的研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 20;25(24):3705-11. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.1900.
3
A prospective study of the impact of genetic susceptibility testing for BRCA1/2 or HNPCC on family relationships.
Fam Cancer. 2025 Feb 26;24(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s10689-025-00450-2.
4
The Development and Evaluation of Novel Patient Educational Material for a Variant of Uncertain Significance (VUS) Result in Hereditary Cancer Genes.新型遗传性癌症基因突变不确定意义(VUS)患者教育材料的开发与评估。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Jun 16;31(6):3361-3378. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31060256.
5
Testing a Population-Based Outreach Intervention for Ovarian Cancer Survivors to Encourage their Close Relatives to Consider Genetic Counseling.基于人群的卵巢癌幸存者随访干预措施,以鼓励其近亲考虑遗传咨询。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Sep 3;33(9):1185-1193. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0147.
6
Health-related roles of older generations in families with inherited genetic conditions: a scoping review.有遗传疾病家庭中老一辈人的健康相关角色:一项范围综述
J Community Genet. 2024 Aug;15(4):351-361. doi: 10.1007/s12687-024-00713-y. Epub 2024 May 25.
7
National Experiences from 30 Years of Provider-Mediated Cascade Testing in Lynch Syndrome Families-The Danish Model.林奇综合征家族30年提供者介导的级联检测的国家经验——丹麦模式
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 20;16(8):1577. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081577.
8
Patient experiences and perceived value of genetic testing in inherited retinal diseases: a cross-sectional survey.遗传性视网膜疾病中基因检测的患者体验和感知价值:一项横断面调查。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 5;14(1):5403. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56121-2.
9
The DCM Project Portal: A direct-to-participant platform of The DCM Research Project.扩张型心肌病(DCM)项目门户:DCM研究项目的直接面向参与者的平台。
Am Heart J Plus. 2024 Feb;38. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2023.100356. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
10
Developing and assessing a kin keeping scale with application to identifying central influencers in African American family networks.开发并评估一种亲属维系量表,并将其应用于识别非裔美国家庭网络中的核心影响者。
J Community Genet. 2023 Dec;14(6):593-603. doi: 10.1007/s12687-023-00665-9. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
一项关于BRCA1/2或遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)基因易感性检测对家庭关系影响的前瞻性研究。
Psychooncology. 2007 Apr;16(4):320-8. doi: 10.1002/pon.1062.
4
What do we tell the children? Contrasting the disclosure choices of two HD families regarding risk status and predictive genetic testing.我们要告诉孩子们什么?对比两个HD家庭在风险状况和预测性基因检测方面的披露选择。
J Genet Couns. 2006 Aug;15(4):253-65. doi: 10.1007/s10897-006-9021-z.
5
"Social separation" among women under 40 years of age diagnosed with breast cancer and carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.被诊断患有乳腺癌且携带BRCA1或BRCA2突变的40岁以下女性中的“社交隔离”
J Genet Couns. 2006 Jun;15(3):149-62. doi: 10.1007/s10897-005-9015-2.
6
Uptake rates for breast cancer genetic testing: a systematic review.乳腺癌基因检测的接受率:一项系统综述。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 May;15(5):840-55. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0002.
7
Facilitating family communication about predictive genetic testing: probands' perceptions.促进家庭关于预测性基因检测的沟通:先证者的看法
J Genet Couns. 2005 Apr;14(2):133-40. doi: 10.1007/s10897-005-0412-3.
8
Informing one's family about genetic testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC): a retrospective exploratory study.向家人告知遗传性非息肉病性结直肠癌(HNPCC)的基因检测:一项回顾性探索性研究。
Fam Cancer. 2005;4(2):163-7. doi: 10.1007/s10689-004-7992-1.
9
Communication about genetic testing in families of male BRCA1/2 carriers and non-carriers: patterns, priorities and problems.男性BRCA1/2基因携带者和非携带者家庭中基因检测的沟通:模式、重点与问题
Clin Genet. 2005 Jun;67(6):492-502. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2005.00443.x.
10
Disclosing genetic test results to family members.向家庭成员披露基因检测结果。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2005;37(1):18-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00007.x.