• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人群的卵巢癌幸存者随访干预措施,以鼓励其近亲考虑遗传咨询。

Testing a Population-Based Outreach Intervention for Ovarian Cancer Survivors to Encourage their Close Relatives to Consider Genetic Counseling.

机构信息

Department of Behavioral, Social and Health Education Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.

Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Sep 3;33(9):1185-1193. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0147.

DOI:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0147
PMID:38912902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11369613/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Most relatives of women with ovarian cancer are unaware of their increased risk for cancer and their eligibility for genetic counseling. State cancer registries offer a platform to communicate about inherited risk to this population.

METHODS

We conducted a two-arm randomized trial to test a theory-based communication intervention-Your Family Connects (YFC)-compared to the standard Georgia Cancer Registry (GCR) contact. A total of 1,938 eligible ovarian cancer survivors were randomly assigned to either the YFC arm (n = 969) or the Standard Care arm (n = 969). We assessed the number of ovarian cancer survivors and their close relatives who logged on to the study website by arm.

RESULTS

Survivor reach was significantly higher in the Standard Care arm than YFC (20.8% vs. 15.2%, respectively; P < 0.001). However, reach to relatives was limited to listed relatives in the YFC arm (n = 20, 13.2%), with little participation from those in the Standard Care arm (n = 1, 0.4%). Pooling across arms, minority race, longer time since diagnosis, and older age were all significantly associated with a decreased likelihood that the survivor accessed the website.

CONCLUSIONS

The YFC intervention showed lower effectiveness for engaging survivors but was more effective than Standard Care in engaging at-risk relatives. Other factors (e.g., time since diagnosis) associated with lower reach must be considered in refining future outreach approaches.

IMPACT

Partnering with a state cancer registry to foster family communication about inherited cancer risk is feasible but the possibility for broad population reach warrants further testing.

摘要

背景

大多数卵巢癌女性的亲属并不了解其癌症风险增加,以及他们是否有资格接受遗传咨询。州癌症登记处为向这一人群传达遗传性风险提供了一个平台。

方法

我们进行了一项两臂随机试验,以测试一种基于理论的沟通干预措施——“Your Family Connects”(YFC)——与标准佐治亚癌症登记处(GCR)联系相比。共有 1938 名符合条件的卵巢癌幸存者被随机分配到 YFC 组(n=969)或标准护理组(n=969)。我们按手臂评估登录研究网站的卵巢癌幸存者及其近亲的数量。

结果

标准护理组的幸存者联系率明显高于 YFC 组(分别为 20.8%和 15.2%;P<0.001)。然而,YFC 组只能联系到登记在册的近亲(n=20,13.2%),而标准护理组的近亲参与度很低(n=1,0.4%)。在两臂之间进行汇总,少数族裔、诊断后时间较长和年龄较大均与幸存者访问网站的可能性降低显著相关。

结论

YFC 干预措施在联系幸存者方面的效果较低,但在联系高危亲属方面比标准护理更有效。其他因素(例如,诊断后时间)与较低的联系率相关,在改进未来的外展方法时必须考虑这些因素。

影响

与州癌症登记处合作促进家庭沟通遗传性癌症风险是可行的,但需要进一步测试是否有可能广泛覆盖人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a56a/11369613/aa422df4b771/epi-24-0147_f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a56a/11369613/34368427ccd4/epi-24-0147_f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a56a/11369613/a9e108bfbe39/epi-24-0147_f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a56a/11369613/aa422df4b771/epi-24-0147_f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a56a/11369613/34368427ccd4/epi-24-0147_f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a56a/11369613/a9e108bfbe39/epi-24-0147_f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a56a/11369613/aa422df4b771/epi-24-0147_f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Testing a Population-Based Outreach Intervention for Ovarian Cancer Survivors to Encourage their Close Relatives to Consider Genetic Counseling.基于人群的卵巢癌幸存者随访干预措施,以鼓励其近亲考虑遗传咨询。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Sep 3;33(9):1185-1193. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0147.
2
Trust and Privacy Concerns Among Cancer Survivors Who Did Not Visit a Research Website Offering Free Genetic Counseling Services for Families: Survey Study.未访问为家庭提供免费遗传咨询服务的研究网站的癌症幸存者的信任和隐私担忧:调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 6;27:e64228. doi: 10.2196/64228.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
5
Identifying Mediators of Intervention Effects Within a Randomized Controlled Trial to Motivate Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment Among Breast and Ovarian Cancer Survivors.在一项随机对照试验中识别干预效果的中介因素,以激励乳腺癌和卵巢癌幸存者进行癌症遗传风险评估。
Ann Behav Med. 2023 Oct 16;57(11):965-977. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaad048.
6
Taxane monotherapy regimens for the treatment of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.紫杉烷类单药治疗方案用于复发性上皮性卵巢癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 12;7(7):CD008766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008766.pub3.
7
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
8
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
9
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer.促进癌症患者及康复者进行习惯性锻炼的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 19;9(9):CD010192. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010192.pub3.
10
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Trust and Privacy Concerns Among Cancer Survivors Who Did Not Visit a Research Website Offering Free Genetic Counseling Services for Families: Survey Study.未访问为家庭提供免费遗传咨询服务的研究网站的癌症幸存者的信任和隐私担忧:调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 6;27:e64228. doi: 10.2196/64228.

本文引用的文献

1
Your Family Connects: A Theory-Based Intervention to Encourage Communication about Possible Inherited Cancer Risk among Ovarian Cancer Survivors and Close Relatives.家庭纽带相连:一项基于理论的干预措施,旨在鼓励卵巢癌幸存者及其近亲之间就可能的遗传性癌症风险进行沟通。
Public Health Genomics. 2023;26(1):77-89. doi: 10.1159/000531772. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
2
Digital interventions for genomics and genetics education, empowerment, and service engagement: A systematic review.用于基因组学和遗传学教育、赋权及服务参与的数字干预措施:一项系统综述。
J Community Genet. 2023 Jun;14(3):227-240. doi: 10.1007/s12687-023-00648-w. Epub 2023 May 18.
3
Applying citizen science to engage families affected by ovarian cancer in developing genetic service outreach strategies.
运用公民科学让受卵巢癌影响的家庭参与制定基因服务拓展策略。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 14;17(2):e0262575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262575. eCollection 2022.
4
Interventions Facilitating Family Communication of Genetic Testing Results and Cascade Screening in Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer or Lynch Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.促进遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌或林奇综合征基因检测结果的家庭沟通及级联筛查的干预措施:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 23;13(4):925. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040925.
5
Barriers and facilitators for cascade testing in genetic conditions: a systematic review.遗传疾病级联检测的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2020 Dec;28(12):1631-1644. doi: 10.1038/s41431-020-00725-5. Epub 2020 Sep 18.
6
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 1.2020.NCCN 指南解读:遗传/家族性高风险评估:乳腺、卵巢和胰腺,第 1.2020 版。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Apr;18(4):380-391. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0017.
7
Improving Screening Uptake among Breast Cancer Survivors and Their First-Degree Relatives at Elevated Risk to Breast Cancer: Results and Implications of a Randomized Study in the State of Georgia.提高乳腺癌幸存者及其乳腺癌高风险一级亲属的筛查率:佐治亚州一项随机研究的结果及意义。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 4;17(3):977. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030977.
8
Germline and Somatic Tumor Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: ASCO Guideline.上皮性卵巢癌的胚系和体细胞肿瘤检测:ASCO 指南。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 10;38(11):1222-1245. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02960. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
9
Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.BRCA 相关癌症的风险评估、遗传咨询和基因检测:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2019 Aug 20;322(7):652-665. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.10987.
10
Carrying out streamlined routine data analyses with reports for observational studies: introduction to a series of generic SAS macros.利用观察性研究报告进行简化的常规数据分析:一系列通用SAS宏介绍
F1000Res. 2018 Dec 19;7:1955. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.16866.2. eCollection 2018.