• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜下急性阑尾炎切除术

Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis.

作者信息

Minutolo Vincenzo, Gagliano Giuseppe, Minutolo Orazio, Carnazza Maurizio, La Terra Salvatore, Buttafuoco Alessandro, Dipietro Salvatore, Lanteri Raffaele

机构信息

Department of Surgical Sciences, Organ Transplantation and Advanced Technologies, University of Catania.

出版信息

Chir Ital. 2009 Sep-Dec;61(5-6):591-6.

PMID:20380263
Abstract

The advantages and applications of the videolaparoscopic technique (VL) versus open surgery in the treatment of acute and complicated appendicitis are not well defined. The aim of this study was to identify which of the two procedures is more suitable. The study examined 124 patients, 73 females (57.5%) and 51 males (42.5%). We compared 62 patients in the laparoscopic group with 62 open surgery patients. We analysed the results of the two groups (VL, open) for age, gender, operative time, hospital stay, complications and costs. The mean patient age was 24.1 years (range: 4-70). The conversion rate was 1.6% (1 case/62). The patients in the laparoscopic group were predominantly female (p < 0.0001). The average age of VL patients compared to open surgery was significantly higher (p < 0.01). The mean operative time was not significantly different between the two groups. The hospitalisation time was shorter for the laparoscopic group (4.77 vs. 6.39 days, p < 0.01). Complications were 0% for VL and 4.81% for the open group. The average operation cost in the open group was 8070.00 euros (+/- 4267) and 6818.00 euros (+/- 1446,00) for VL (p < 0.05). Laparoscopic appendectomy has significant advantages over traditional open surgery and should be the first choice in cases of acute but uncomplicated appendicitis.

摘要

在治疗急性复杂性阑尾炎方面,视频腹腔镜技术(VL)与开放手术相比的优势及应用尚未明确界定。本研究的目的是确定这两种手术方式哪种更合适。该研究对124例患者进行了检查,其中女性73例(57.5%),男性51例(42.5%)。我们将腹腔镜组的62例患者与62例接受开放手术的患者进行了比较。我们分析了两组(VL组、开放手术组)在年龄、性别、手术时间、住院时间、并发症及费用方面的结果。患者的平均年龄为24.1岁(范围:4 - 70岁)。中转率为1.6%(1例/62例)。腹腔镜组患者以女性为主(p < 0.0001)。与开放手术相比,VL组患者的平均年龄显著更高(p < 0.01)。两组的平均手术时间无显著差异。腹腔镜组的住院时间较短(4.77天对6.39天,p < 0.01)。VL组的并发症发生率为0%,开放手术组为4.81%。开放手术组的平均手术费用为8070.00欧元(±4267),VL组为6818.00欧元(±1446.00)(p < 0.05)。腹腔镜阑尾切除术相对于传统开放手术具有显著优势,在急性非复杂性阑尾炎病例中应作为首选。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis.腹腔镜下急性阑尾炎切除术
Chir Ital. 2009 Sep-Dec;61(5-6):591-6.
2
[Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: which factors influence the decision between the surgical techniques?].[腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:哪些因素影响手术技术的选择?]
Zentralbl Chir. 2005 Feb;130(1):48-54. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-836240.
3
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗复杂性阑尾炎
J Am Coll Surg. 2007 Jul;205(1):60-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.03.017.
4
[Acute appendicitis--open or laparoscopic surgery?].[急性阑尾炎——开腹手术还是腹腔镜手术?]
Przegl Lek. 2003;60 Suppl 7:70-4.
5
Complicated appendicitis--is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting.复杂性阑尾炎——腹腔镜手术方法是否合适?与开放手术方法的比较研究:社区医院环境下的结果
Am Surg. 2007 Aug;73(8):737-41; discussion 741-2.
6
[Laparoscopic or open appendectomy. Critical review of the literature and personal experience].[腹腔镜或开放性阑尾切除术。文献综述与个人经验]
G Chir. 2001 Oct;22(10):353-7.
7
Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis: is there really any benefit?腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎:真的有任何益处吗?
Am Surg. 1993 Aug;59(8):541-7; discussion 547-8.
8
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: results of a retrospective comparison in an Israeli hospital.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:以色列一家医院的回顾性比较结果
Isr Med Assoc J. 2002 Feb;4(2):91-4.
9
[Laparoscopic approach in acute appendicitis: experience with 501 consecutive cases].[急性阑尾炎的腹腔镜手术方法:501例连续病例的经验]
Chir Ital. 2009 May-Jun;61(3):327-35.
10
[Open versus laparoscopic operation for perforated appendicitis--a comparative study].[开放性手术与腹腔镜手术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎的比较研究]
Zentralbl Chir. 2005 Apr;130(2):137-41. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-836411.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis using ArtiSential® wristed articulated instrument.使用ArtiSential®腕关节式器械行单孔腹腔镜下穿孔性阑尾炎切除术
J Minim Access Surg. 2023 Jan-Mar;19(1):168-171. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_394_21.
2
Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis during pregnancy.孕期急性阑尾炎的单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术
J Minim Access Surg. 2021 Jan-Mar;17(1):37-42. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_193_19.
3
Outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis: 4-years experience in a district hospital.
腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效及成本分析:一家区级医院的4年经验
BMC Surg. 2014 Mar 19;14:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-14.