Suppr超能文献

一项针对疑病症患者的认知行为疗法与短期心理动力学心理治疗与无干预的随机临床试验。

A randomized clinical trial of cognitive behavioural therapy versus short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy versus no intervention for patients with hypochondriasis.

机构信息

Liaison Psychiatry Unit, Psykiatrisk Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

Psychol Med. 2011 Feb;41(2):431-41. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710000292. Epub 2010 Apr 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypochondriasis is common in the clinic and in the community. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has been found to be effective in previous trials. Psychodynamic psychotherapy is a treatment routinely offered to patients with hypochondriasis in many countries, including Denmark. The aim of this study was to test CBT for hypochondriasis in a centre that was not involved in its development and compare both CBT and short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy (STPP) to a waiting-list control and to each other. CBT was modified by including mindfulness and group therapy sessions, reducing the therapist time required. STPP consisted of individual sessions.

METHOD

Eighty patients randomized to CBT, STPP and the waiting list were assessed on measures of health anxiety and general psychopathology before and after a 6-month treatment period. Waiting-list patients were subsequently offered one of the two active treatments on the basis of re-randomization, and assessed on the same measures post-treatment. Patients were again assessed at 6- and 12-month follow-up points.

RESULTS

Patients who received CBT did significantly better on all measures relative to the waiting-list control group, and on a specific measure of health anxiety compared with STPP. The STPP group did not significantly differ from the waiting-list group on any outcome measures. Similar differences were observed between CBT and STPP during follow-up, although some of the significant differences between groups were lost.

CONCLUSIONS

A modified and time-saving CBT programme is effective in the treatment of hypochondriasis, although the two psychotherapeutic interventions differed in structure.

摘要

背景

疑病症在临床和社区中都很常见。认知行为疗法(CBT)在前几次试验中被证明是有效的。心理动力学心理治疗是许多国家(包括丹麦)常规提供给疑病症患者的一种治疗方法。本研究的目的是在一个没有参与其开发的中心测试 CBT 对疑病症的疗效,并将 CBT 和短期心理动力学心理治疗(STPP)与等待名单对照以及彼此进行比较。CBT 通过包括正念和小组治疗课程进行了修改,减少了治疗师所需的时间。STPP 由个体会议组成。

方法

80 名随机分配到 CBT、STPP 和等待名单的患者在 6 个月治疗期前后接受健康焦虑和一般精神病理学的测量。等待名单上的患者随后根据重新随机化接受两种主动治疗之一,并在治疗后接受相同的测量。患者在 6 个月和 12 个月的随访点再次接受评估。

结果

与等待名单对照组相比,接受 CBT 的患者在所有测量指标上均显著改善,在特定的健康焦虑测量指标上也显著优于 STPP。STPP 组在任何结果测量指标上与等待名单组均无显著差异。在随访期间,CBT 和 STPP 之间也观察到了类似的差异,尽管一些组间的显著差异消失了。

结论

一种经过修改和节省时间的 CBT 方案对疑病症的治疗有效,尽管两种心理治疗干预在结构上有所不同。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验