School of Population Health M431, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
Midwifery. 2011 Oct;27(5):e156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
to explore women's perceptions of conflicting advice around breast feeding from formal support networks, specifically health professionals involved in postnatal support.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: a qualitative exploratory design was employed using the critical incident technique. Data were obtained from 62 Western Australian women who responded to an invitation to share incidents of receiving conflicting advice. Women who had breast fed a child within the past 12 months shared their experience through a telephone interview (n = 50) or completing a brief questionnaire (n = 12) addressing the following questions: Describe a situation in detail where you felt you received conflicting advice about breast feeding from a health professional. How did this situation affect you and/or your breast feeding?
a modified constant comparison method was used to analyse the critical incidents revealing commonalities under who offered conflicting advice; what contributed to advice being perceived as conflicting; topic areas more inclined to being regarded as conflicting; what protected against advice being perceived as conflicting; the consequences of receiving conflicting advice; and strategies that women used to manage these incidents.
advice that was viewed as conflicting extended beyond the provision of information that was inconsistent or directly contradictory, and included issues around information overload and disparities between the mother's and health professional's expectations. The manner of presenting information or advice, the skills of using effective communication, demonstration of a caring attitude with an empathic approach and focusing upon the woman as an individual were seen to be important to minimise these incidents. Attention to women's perceptions and the consequences of conflicting advice must be addressed, otherwise the credibility and confidence in health professionals' knowledge and ability to support breast feeding is questioned, resulting in a valuable support network being selectively ignored.
探讨女性对来自产后支持中涉及的正式支持网络(尤其是健康专业人员)的母乳喂养方面相互矛盾的建议的看法。
设计、地点和参与者:采用定性探索性设计和关键事件技术。数据来自 62 名西澳大利亚女性,她们对接受相互矛盾的建议的邀请做出了回应。在过去 12 个月内母乳喂养过孩子的女性通过电话访谈(n=50)或完成一份简短的问卷(n=12)分享了她们的经验,这些问题涉及:详细描述您感到从健康专业人员那里收到关于母乳喂养的相互矛盾的建议的情况。这种情况如何影响您和/或您的母乳喂养?
使用改进的恒定比较方法对关键事件进行分析,揭示了提供相互矛盾的建议的人员、导致建议被视为相互矛盾的因素、更倾向于被视为相互矛盾的主题领域、防止建议被视为相互矛盾的因素、接受相互矛盾的建议的后果以及女性用来处理这些事件的策略等方面的共性。
被视为相互矛盾的建议不仅限于提供不一致或直接矛盾的信息,还包括信息过载和母亲与健康专业人员期望之间差距等问题。呈现信息或建议的方式、有效沟通技巧的运用、表现出关怀态度和同理心以及关注女性作为个体,这些都被认为是减少这些事件的重要因素。必须关注女性的看法和相互矛盾的建议的后果,否则会对健康专业人员支持母乳喂养的知识和能力的可信度和信心提出质疑,导致有价值的支持网络被选择性地忽视。