Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Health Place. 2010 Jul;16(4):744-54. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2010.03.006. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
Compared to people with a high socioeconomic status, those with a lower socioeconomic status are more likely to perceive their neighbourhood as unattractive and unsafe, which is associated with their lower levels of physical activity. Agreement between objective and perceived environmental factors is often found to be moderate or low, so it is questionable to what extent 'creating supportive neighbourhoods' would change neighbourhood perceptions. This study among residents (N=814) of fourteen neighbourhoods in the city of Eindhoven (the Netherlands), investigated to what extent socioeconomic differences in perceived neighbourhood safety and perceived neighbourhood attractiveness can be explained by five domains of objective neighbourhood features (i.e. design, traffic safety, social safety, aesthetics, and destinations), and to what extent other factors may play a role. Unfavourable neighbourhood perceptions of low socioeconomic groups partly reflected their actual less aesthetic and less safe neighbourhoods, and partly their perceptions of low social neighbourhood cohesion and adverse psychosocial circumstances.
与社会经济地位较高的人相比,社会经济地位较低的人更有可能认为他们的社区没有吸引力和不安全,这与他们较低的身体活动水平有关。人们发现,客观环境因素和感知到的环境因素之间的一致性通常是中等或低等的,因此,“创造支持性社区”在多大程度上能够改变对社区的看法是值得怀疑的。这项研究在荷兰埃因霍温市的 14 个社区的居民(N=814)中进行,旨在调查感知社区安全和感知社区吸引力方面的社会经济差异在多大程度上可以用五个客观社区特征领域(即设计、交通安全、社会安全、美学和目的地)来解释,以及其他因素在多大程度上可能起作用。社会经济地位较低的群体对社区的不利看法部分反映了他们所在社区的实际环境不美观和不安全,部分反映了他们对社会社区凝聚力低和不良心理社会环境的看法。