Suppr超能文献

社会资本是否在历史资产密度较高的地区更高?对居住在英格兰的 11112 名成年人的分析。

Is social capital higher in areas with a higher density of historic assets? Analyses of 11,112 adults living in England.

机构信息

Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology & Health Care, University College London, London, UK.

Historic England, Policy and Evidence, London, UK.

出版信息

Perspect Public Health. 2024 Jul;144(4):251-262. doi: 10.1177/17579139221145609. Epub 2023 Feb 12.

Abstract

AIMS

Previous evidence suggests that engagement with heritage such as visiting heritage sites provides benefits for people's mental and social wellbeing, and helps to establish social capital. However, far less is known about whether living in areas of historic built environment also helps build social capital. Furthermore, it remains unclear how the association between historic built environment and social capital may vary across heritage engagement frequency and areas of deprivation levels. This study was therefore designed to explore the cross-sectional relationship between historic built environment and social capital.

METHODS

Analysis was based on three datasets: Understanding Society: The UK Household Longitudinal Study Waves 5 (2013/2015) and 6 (2014/2016), 2019 National Heritage List for England, and 2015 English Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD). Ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions were applied to estimate the relationships between historic built environment (listed buildings, scheduled monuments, and registered parks and gardens) and social capital (personal relationships, social network support, civic engagement, and trust and cooperative norms).

RESULTS

We found that people living in places with greater historic built environment experienced higher levels of personal relationships, social network support, and civic engagement. However, these associations were attenuated once rurality was adjusted. Individuals living in areas of greater levels of historic built environment displayed higher levels of trust and cooperative norms, even after adjusting for all relevant covariates. Heritage engagement frequency was found to moderate the association between historic built environment and personal relationships. Similarly, IMD was also found to moderate the association between historic built environment and trust and cooperative norms.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the importance of neighbourhood environment in building social capital in communities. Particularly, areas with heritage assets may provide both socially inviting and aesthetically pleasing environments that could help strengthen community and restore pride in place.

摘要

目的

先前的证据表明,参与遗产保护活动(如参观遗产地)有益于人们的身心健康和社交福祉,并有助于建立社会资本。然而,对于居住在历史建筑环境中是否也有助于建立社会资本,人们知之甚少。此外,人们对于历史建筑环境与社会资本之间的关联如何因遗产参与频率和贫困地区的不同而有所差异,仍不清楚。因此,本研究旨在探讨历史建筑环境与社会资本之间的横断面关系。

方法

分析基于三个数据集:英国社会动态调查:家庭纵向研究第 5 波(2013/2015 年)和第 6 波(2014/2016 年)、2019 年英格兰国家遗产名录和 2015 年英格兰综合多因素贫困指数(IMD)。应用普通最小二乘法(OLS)回归来估计历史建筑环境(列入名录的建筑、古迹和注册公园和花园)与社会资本(人际关系、社会网络支持、公民参与以及信任和合作规范)之间的关系。

结果

我们发现,居住在历史建筑环境较多的地方的人,人际关系、社会网络支持和公民参与度更高。然而,一旦调整了农村因素,这些关联就会减弱。居住在历史建筑环境水平较高地区的人表现出更高水平的信任和合作规范,即使在调整了所有相关协变量后也是如此。遗产参与频率被发现可以调节历史建筑环境与人际关系之间的关联。同样,IMD 也被发现可以调节历史建筑环境与信任和合作规范之间的关联。

结论

这些发现强调了邻里环境在社区建设社会资本方面的重要性。特别是,具有遗产资产的地区可能提供既具有社交吸引力又具有美学吸引力的环境,这有助于加强社区并恢复对地方的自豪感。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/80da/11308256/d8ebddd00b38/10.1177_17579139221145609-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验