• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区资产促进健康模型与评估量表:基于德尔菲法的分析与专家验证。

Community Assets for Health Model and Assessment Scale: A Delphi-Based Analysis and Expert Validation.

机构信息

Department of Community Nursing, Preventive Medicine, Public Health and History of Science, University of Alicante, E-03080 Alicante, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 27;19(21):13979. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113979.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph192113979
PMID:36360857
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9658865/
Abstract

The salutogenesis theory of Aaron Antonovsky and the Health Assets Model of Morgan and Ziglio have given rise to a notable interest in defining the resources available to individuals and the community to maintain or improve their health and well-being. The present study began by identifying the universal dimensions of Community Assets for Health, and then analyzed and validated an assessment scale following the Delphi method. A high degree of consensus was achieved among 13 experts from different disciplines. The results of the content analysis and statistical analysis led to a reconfiguring of an instrument that is so far unique in its approach. It is composed of 103 items across 14 dimensions (utility, intention, previous use, affordability, proximity, walkability, connectivity, intelligibility, identity, design, safety, diversity, public dimension, and sustainability).

摘要

阿龙·安东诺维茨(Aaron Antonovsky)的健康本源论和摩根(Morgan)与齐利戈(Ziglio)的健康资产模型引起了人们对定义个人和社区可用于维持或改善其健康和幸福的资源的浓厚兴趣。本研究首先确定了社区健康资产的普遍维度,然后使用德尔菲法对评估量表进行了分析和验证。来自不同学科的 13 名专家达成了高度共识。内容分析和统计分析的结果导致了仪器的重新配置,这在方法上是独一无二的。它由 14 个维度的 103 个项目组成(实用性、意图、先前使用、负担能力、接近度、可步行性、连通性、可理解性、身份认同、设计、安全性、多样性、公共维度和可持续性)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9a7/9658865/4f8f3a93b84d/ijerph-19-13979-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9a7/9658865/4f8f3a93b84d/ijerph-19-13979-g0A1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9a7/9658865/4f8f3a93b84d/ijerph-19-13979-g0A1.jpg

相似文献

1
Community Assets for Health Model and Assessment Scale: A Delphi-Based Analysis and Expert Validation.社区资产促进健康模型与评估量表:基于德尔菲法的分析与专家验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 27;19(21):13979. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113979.
2
Dimensions of Community Assets for Health. A Systematised Review and Meta-Synthesis.促进健康的社区资产维度。一项系统评价与元综合分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 27;18(11):5758. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115758.
3
Assessment of Competence in EVAR Procedures: A Novel Rating Scale Developed by the Delphi Technique.腔内血管修复术(EVAR)操作能力评估:一种通过德尔菲技术开发的新型评分量表。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017 Jul;54(1):34-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 May 23.
4
Analysis of Variables That Influence the Walkability of School Environments Based on the Delphi Method.基于德尔菲法的学校环境可步行性影响因素分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 30;19(21):14201. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192114201.
5
Evaluation of competence in ultrasound-guided procedures-a generic assessment tool developed through the Delphi method.超声引导操作能力评估——一种通过德尔菲法开发的通用评估工具。
Eur Radiol. 2021 Jun;31(6):4203-4211. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07280-z. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
6
Towards Consensus on Clinical Assessment of Embouchure in Brass Players: A Delphi Study.关于铜管乐器演奏者口型临床评估的共识达成:一项德尔菲研究。
Med Probl Perform Art. 2019 Mar;34(1):6-13. doi: 10.21091/mppa.2019.1003.
7
Construction and validation of an instrument for the structural assessment of wards for urinary continence in older adults.老年人尿失禁病房结构评估工具的构建与验证
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2020 Oct 19;28:e3374. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.3361.3374. eCollection 2020.
8
Pesticide applicators questionnaire content validation: A fuzzy delphi method.农药施用者调查问卷内容效度:一种模糊德尔菲法。
Med J Malaysia. 2017 Aug;72(4):228-235.
9
Delphi, non-RAND modified Delphi, RAND/UCLA appropriateness method and a novel group awareness and consensus methodology for consensus measurement: a systematic literature review.德尔菲法、非随机化德尔菲法、RAND/UCLA 适宜性方法和一种新的共识测量群体意识和共识方法:系统文献回顾。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Nov;36(11):1873-1887. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1816946. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
10
Development of an elderly lifestyle profile: A Delphi survey of multidisciplinary health-care experts.老年生活方式特征的制定:多学科医疗保健专家的德尔菲调查。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 2;15(6):e0233565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233565. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Dimensions of Community Assets for Health. A Systematised Review and Meta-Synthesis.促进健康的社区资产维度。一项系统评价与元综合分析
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 27;18(11):5758. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115758.
2
Intergenerational understandings of personal, social and community assets for health.对个人、社会和社区健康资产的代际理解。
Health Place. 2019 May;57:218-227. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 17.
3
Using Asset Mapping to Engage Youth in Community-Based Participatory Research: The WE Project.
利用资产映射让青少年参与基于社区的参与式研究:WE项目。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2018;12(2):223-236. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2018.0042.
4
The mismatch between observational measures and residents' perspectives on the retail food environment: a mixed-methods approach in the Heart Healthy Hoods study.观察性测量与居民对零售食品环境的看法之间的不匹配:心脏健康社区研究中的混合方法。
Public Health Nutr. 2017 Nov;20(16):2970-2979. doi: 10.1017/S1368980017001604. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
5
Operational Definitions of Walkable Neighborhood: Theoretical and Empirical Insights.可步行社区的操作定义:理论与实证见解
J Phys Act Health. 2006 Feb;3(s1):S99-S117. doi: 10.1123/jpah.3.s1.s99.
6
The link between perceived characteristics of neighbourhood green spaces and adults' physical activity in UK cities: analysis of the EURO-URHIS 2 Study.英国城市感知邻里绿地特征与成年人身体活动之间的关联:EURO-URHIS 2 研究分析。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Aug 1;27(4):761-765. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx033.
7
Collaborating to Create Healthier Communities.携手共创更健康的社区。
Int Q Community Health Educ. 2017 Jan;37(2):129-133. doi: 10.1177/0272684X16685256. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
8
Perceived urban neighborhood environment for physical activity of older adults in Seoul, Korea: A multimethod qualitative study.韩国首尔老年人体育活动感知城市邻里环境:一项多方法定性研究。
Prev Med. 2017 Oct;103S:S90-S98. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.12.033. Epub 2016 Dec 24.
9
Urban density, diversity and design: Is more always better for walking? A study from Hong Kong.城市密度、多样性和设计:对于步行来说,更多总是更好吗?来自香港的一项研究。
Prev Med. 2017 Oct;103S:S99-S103. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.08.042. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
10
Neighbourhood and physical activity in German adolescents: GINIplus and LISAplus.德国青少年的邻里环境与身体活动:GINIplus和LISAplus研究
Environ Res. 2016 May;147:284-93. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2016.02.023. Epub 2016 Feb 23.