Suppr超能文献

[单一心脏病诊所两个连续不同时间段内1650例永久性起搏器植入术的回顾性分析]

[Retrospective analysis of 1650 permanent pacemaker implantations experience over two different consecutive time periods in a single cardiology clinic].

作者信息

Bayata Serdar, Yeşil Murat, Arikan Erdinç, Postaci Nurşen, Berilğen Rida, Ceylan Ozgür, Avci Eyüp

机构信息

Izmir Atatürk Eğitim ve Araştirma Hastanesi, Izmir, Türkiye.

出版信息

Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2010 Apr;10(2):130-4. doi: 10.5152/akd.2010.037.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Indications for pacing, pacing modes, and demographics of patients who underwent pacemaker implantation between two different time periods were compared in this study.

METHODS

Pacemaker registry of our cardiology department was used to evaluate these changes from 1986 to 2007 (First period: 1986-1996, second period: 1997-2007) retrospectively.

RESULTS

Registry revealed 776 implantations in the first and 874 implantations in the second period. The percentages of first implantation were 89% and 70.1% respectively. Nearly 50% of the patients in both periods were female. Main indications for pacing were atrioventricular (AV) block, sick sinus syndrome (SSS) and slow ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation in both periods. Implantation of VVI-AAI pacemakers have decreased (77.8%/1.5% to 51%/0.3%, p=0.05) and implantation of DDD-VDD pacemakers have increased (19.3%/1.3% to 42.3%/6.3%, p=0.05) during the second period compared to the first period. Permanent pacemaker implantation for SSS has decreased significantly from 31.1% in the first period to 12.0% (p=0.05) in the second period. Implantation for AV block has increased significantly from 63.3% to 79.7% (p=0.05) in the second period.

CONCLUSION

Our data revealed temporal changes in pacemaker implantation practice during last twenty years in the cardiology department of a teaching hospital. Implantation of VVI-AAI pacemakers have decreased significantly during the second period. Permanent pacemaker implantation for AV block has also decreased during the last period.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了两个不同时间段接受起搏器植入患者的起搏适应证、起搏模式及人口统计学特征。

方法

回顾性分析我院心内科1986年至2007年起搏器登记资料(第一阶段:1986 - 1996年,第二阶段:1997 - 2007年),评估这些变化。

结果

登记资料显示第一阶段有776例植入,第二阶段有874例植入。首次植入的比例分别为89%和70.1%。两个阶段近50%的患者为女性。两个阶段起搏的主要适应证均为房室传导阻滞、病态窦房结综合征(SSS)及房颤时心室率缓慢。与第一阶段相比,第二阶段VVI - AAI起搏器的植入率下降(77.8%/1.5%降至51%/0.3%,p = 0.05),DDD - VDD起搏器的植入率上升(19.3%/1.3%升至42.3%/6.3%,p = 0.05)。SSS患者永久起搏器植入率从第一阶段的31.1%显著降至第二阶段的12.0%(p = 0.05)。第二阶段房室传导阻滞患者的植入率从63.3%显著升至79.7%(p = 0.05)。

结论

我们的数据揭示了一所教学医院心内科过去二十年起搏器植入实践的时间变化。第二阶段VVI - AAI起搏器的植入率显著下降。最后阶段房室传导阻滞患者永久起搏器植入率也有所下降。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验