Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, Middlesex, UK.
Target Oncol. 2010 Mar;5(1):39-52. doi: 10.1007/s11523-010-0135-8. Epub 2010 Apr 11.
There is an increasing awareness that anatomical approaches based on measurements of tumor size have significant limitations for assessing therapy response. Functional imaging techniques are increasing being used to monitor response to therapies with novel mechanisms of action, often predicting the success of therapy before conventional measurements have changed. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the most advanced in their evidence base, and in this manuscript we focus on them as response parameters. Technology, data gathering methods, and current limitations for these techniques are addressed. With few exceptions, most studies shows that successful treatment is reflected by increases in tumor water diffusion values visible as increased apparent diffusion coefficient values. Most response assessment studies also show that successful treatment results in decreases in tumor vascularization and microvessel permeability.
人们越来越意识到,基于肿瘤大小测量的解剖方法在评估治疗反应方面存在显著的局限性。功能成像技术越来越多地被用于监测具有新型作用机制的治疗反应,通常在常规测量发生变化之前就预测治疗的成功。动态对比增强和扩散磁共振成像(MRI)在其证据基础方面最为先进,在本文中,我们将重点介绍它们作为反应参数。本文讨论了这些技术的技术、数据收集方法和当前的局限性。除了少数例外,大多数研究表明,成功的治疗反映在肿瘤水扩散值的增加上,这表现为表观扩散系数值的增加。大多数反应评估研究还表明,成功的治疗会导致肿瘤血管生成和微血管通透性的降低。