Uchiyama Iwao
Kyoto University.
Kaibogaku Zasshi. 2010 Mar;85(1):29-34.
The indoor air quality guideline (0.08 ppm) for formaldehyde was set in 1997. Afterwards, the occupational indoor air quality guideline for workplace where formaldehyde was manufactured or treated (the specific workplace handling formaldehyde) was set at the value of 0.25 ppm. In addition, the Labor Standards Bureau of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, has done a risk-based evaluation by using risk assessment analysis, in order to prevent the adverse effect of certain chemical materials on workers' health. In the case of formaldehyde, the primary evaluation value was assumed to be 0.033 ppm that corresponded in carcinogenic risk level 10(-4) with adjusted level for workers. The secondary evaluation value was assumed to be 0.3 ppm which was the Threshold Limit Value-Ceiling (TLV-C) recommended by the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Working environment measurement ("A" measurement methods) and/or individual exposure monitoring of formaldehyde at 22 workshops, where workers were potentially exposed to formaldehyde, were performed. The working environmental level in 3 workshops and the individual exposure level of 14 workers exceeded the secondary evaluation value (0.3 ppm). The rule for preventing the impairment of workers' health caused by the specified chemical substances was then revised so that formaldehyde was controlled more strictly and was reclassified from the third group to the second group of specified chemical substances. In addition, the administrative level of formaldehyde was set to 0.1 ppm, because of around a half of TLV-C value. Medical students have exposed to about 0.55 ppm in average formaldehyde during anatomy practice in the investigation of Japanese Association of Anatomists, though the gross anatomy practice room does not receive the restriction of the administrative level of formaldehyde. It is preferable that the exposure concentration of formaldehyde to the medical students is 0.1 ppm or less because formaldehyde is an irritant gas and a sensitizing potential, and is also a human carcinogen.
1997年制定了甲醛的室内空气质量指南(0.08 ppm)。此后,针对甲醛制造或处理场所(特定甲醛处理工作场所)的职业室内空气质量指南设定为0.25 ppm。此外,厚生劳动省劳动基准局通过风险评估分析进行了基于风险的评估,以防止某些化学物质对工人健康产生不利影响。就甲醛而言,主要评估值假定为0.033 ppm,该值与工人调整后的致癌风险水平10(-4)相对应。次要评估值假定为0.3 ppm,这是美国政府工业卫生学家会议推荐的阈限值上限(TLV-C)。对22个工人可能接触甲醛的车间进行了工作环境测量(“A”测量方法)和/或甲醛个人暴露监测。3个车间的工作环境水平和14名工人的个人暴露水平超过了次要评估值(0.3 ppm)。于是修订了防止特定化学物质损害工人健康的规定,以便更严格地控制甲醛,并将其从指定化学物质第三组重新分类为第二组。此外,由于约为TLV-C值的一半,甲醛的管理水平设定为0.1 ppm。在日本解剖学家协会的调查中,医学生在解剖实习期间平均接触约0.55 ppm的甲醛,尽管大体解剖实习室不受甲醛管理水平的限制。由于甲醛是一种刺激性气体且有致敏潜力,也是一种人类致癌物,医学生接触甲醛的浓度最好为0.1 ppm或更低。