Suppr超能文献

大体解剖实验室中的甲醛暴露——个人暴露水平高于室内浓度。

Formaldehyde exposure in a gross anatomy laboratory--personal exposure level is higher than indoor concentration.

作者信息

Ohmichi Kimihide, Komiyama Masatoshi, Matsuno Yoshiharu, Takanashi Yoshimitsu, Miyamoto Hiroshi, Kadota Tomoko, Maekawa Mamiko, Toyama Yoshiro, Tatsugi Yukitoshi, Kohno Toshihiko, Ohmichi Masayoshi, Mori Chisato

机构信息

Department of Bioenvironmental Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba 260-8670, Japan.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2006 Mar;13(2):120-4. doi: 10.1065/espr2005.06.265.

Abstract

GOAL, SCOPE AND BACKGROUND: Cadavers for gross anatomy laboratories are usually prepared by using embalming fluid which contains formaldehyde (FA) as a principal component. During the process of dissection, FA vapors are emitted from the cadavers, resulting in the exposure of medical students and their instructors to elevated levels of FA in the laboratory. The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) has set a ceiling limit for FA at 0.3 ppm. In Japan, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare has set an air quality guideline defining two limit values for environmental exposure to FA: 0.08 ppm as an average for general workplaces and 0.25 ppm for specific workplaces such as an FA factory. Although there are many reports on indoor FA concentrations in gross anatomy laboratories, only a few reports have described personal FA exposure levels. The purpose of the present study was to clarify personal exposure levels as well as indoor FA concentrations in our laboratory in order to investigate the relationship between them.

METHODS

The gross anatomy laboratory was evaluated in the 4th, 10th and 18th sessions of 20 laboratory sessions in total over a period of 10 weeks. Air samples were collected using a diffusive sampling device for organic carbonyl compounds. Area samples were taken in the center and four corners of the laboratory during the entire time of each session (4-6 hours). Personal samples were collected from instructors and students using a sampling device pinned on each person's lapel, and they were 1.1 to 6 hours in duration. Analysis was carried out using high performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Room averages of FA concentrations were 0.45, 0.38 and 0.68 ppm for the 4th, 10th and 18th sessions, respectively, ranging from 0.23 to 1.03 ppm. These levels were comparable to or relatively lower than the levels reported previously, but were still higher than the guideline limit for specific workplaces in Japan and the ACGIH ceiling limit. The indoor FA concentrations varied depending on the contents of laboratory sessions and seemed to increase when body cavity or deep structures were being dissected. In all sessions but the 4th, FA levels at the center of the room were higher than those in the corners. This might be related to the arrangement of air supply diffusers and return grills. However, it cannot be ruled out that FA levels in the corners were lowered by leakage of FA through the doors and windows. Average personal exposure levels were 0.80, 0.45 and 0.51 ppm for instructors and 1.02, 1.08 and 0.89 ppm for students for the 4th, 10th and 18th session, respectively. The exposure levels of students were significantly higher than the mean indoor FA concentrations in the 4th and 10th sessions, and the same tendency was also observed in the 18th session. The personal exposure level of instructors was also significantly higher than the indoor FA level in the 4th session, while they were almost the same in the 10th and 18th sessions. Differences in behavior during the sessions might reflect the differential personal exposure levels between students and instructors.

CONCLUSION

The present study revealed that, if a person is close to the cadavers during the gross anatomy laboratory, his/her personal exposure level is possibly 2 to 3-fold higher than the mean indoor FA concentration. This should be considered in the risk assessment of FA in gross anatomy laboratories.

RECOMMENDATION AND OUTLOOK

If the risk of FA in gross anatomy laboratories is assessed based on the indoor FA levels, the possibility that personal exposure levels are 2 to 3-fold higher than the mean indoor FA level should be taken into account. Otherwise, the risk should be assessed based on the personal exposure levels. However, it is hard to measure everyone's exposure level. Therefore, further studies are necessary to develop a method of personal exposure assessment from the indoor FA concentration.

摘要

目标、范围和背景:大体解剖实验室使用的尸体通常用含有甲醛(FA)作为主要成分的防腐液进行处理。在解剖过程中,尸体会释放出FA蒸汽,导致医学生及其教师在实验室中接触到更高水平的FA。美国政府工业卫生学家会议(ACGIH)将FA的上限设定为0.3 ppm。在日本,厚生劳动省制定了空气质量指南,规定了FA环境暴露的两个限值:一般工作场所的平均值为0.08 ppm,FA工厂等特定工作场所为0.25 ppm。虽然有许多关于大体解剖实验室室内FA浓度的报告,但只有少数报告描述了个人FA暴露水平。本研究的目的是明确我们实验室中的个人暴露水平以及室内FA浓度,以研究它们之间的关系。

方法

在为期10周的20次实验室课程中的第4次、第10次和第18次课程中对大体解剖实验室进行评估。使用用于有机羰基化合物的扩散采样装置收集空气样本。在每次课程的整个时间段(4 - 6小时)内,在实验室的中心和四个角落采集区域样本。使用别在每个人翻领上的采样装置从教师和学生那里收集个人样本,采样持续时间为1.1至6小时。使用高效液相色谱法进行分析。

结果与讨论

第4次、第10次和第18次课程的室内FA浓度平均值分别为0.45、0.38和0.68 ppm,范围为0.23至1.03 ppm。这些水平与先前报告的水平相当或相对较低,但仍高于日本特定工作场所的指南限值和ACGIH上限。室内FA浓度因课程内容而异,在解剖体腔或深部结构时似乎会增加。除第4次课程外,在所有课程中,房间中心的FA水平均高于角落处。这可能与送风扩散器和回风格栅的布置有关。然而,不能排除角落处的FA水平因通过门窗泄漏而降低的可能性。第4次、第10次和第18次课程中,教师的平均个人暴露水平分别为0.80、0.45和0.51 ppm,学生的分别为1.02、1.08和0.89 ppm。在第4次和第10次课程中,学生的暴露水平显著高于室内FA平均浓度,第18次课程也观察到相同趋势。在第4次课程中,教师的个人暴露水平也显著高于室内FA水平,而在第10次和第18次课程中两者几乎相同。课程期间行为的差异可能反映了学生和教师之间个人暴露水平的差异。

结论

本研究表明,如果一个人在大体解剖实验室期间靠近尸体,其个人暴露水平可能比室内FA平均浓度高2至3倍。在大体解剖实验室FA的风险评估中应考虑这一点。

建议与展望

如果基于室内FA水平评估大体解剖实验室中FA的风险,则应考虑个人暴露水平可能比室内FA平均水平高2至3倍的可能性。否则,应基于个人暴露水平进行风险评估。然而,很难测量每个人的暴露水平。因此,有必要进一步开展研究,以开发一种从室内FA浓度评估个人暴露的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验